Printable View
Why do we get now on some sites (Bobs, Transexpov, Grooby Club and maybe some more) sets with even smaller pictures sizes?
The normal pix here (2560 x 1706 pixels) are below the standards (3000 x 2000), but I could perfectly live with it. But now with the new reduced dimensions (2048 x 1365) they are just small for my liking.
What is the intention behind that move?
GroobyMike, GroobySteven, anyone?
Except this bot above? :(
Ok, looks like the bots have taken control over the forums.
Note to myself: Do not ever try to renew the subscription to those mentioned sites. Dang, I loved TG40 and Bobs site. I'll miss them. :(
I was traveling last week and don't get to this forum if on the road, you can always email customerservice@grooby.com
I don't know who sets the 'stanards' but we haven't reduced any dimensions other than if there was a different format camera.
Can you point me to a set that is reduced? As I've just had a quick look and everything from those sites appears to be 2560x1706
Thanks for your reply Steven,
I just checked it again. It was from about mid october until about last week. Now the pic sizes seem to be back to 2560.
The sites involved are Bobs, Transexpov, Femout and Grooby.club.
For Bobs site:
It starts with Paradise on 13th Oct 2023 and almost every set after is affected. For instance compare Addis first and second set (then 2048 and now back to 2560).
https://www.bobstgirls.com/members/models/Addi.html
Femout:
Harleen Quinzel, third set reduced size and with no. 4 back to normal.
https://www.femout.xxx/members/model...n-quinzel.html
Transexpov:
See Chanel Noir for example. was overwhelmed to see more her, but was a bit disappointed to get such small pictures.
https://www.transexpov.com/members/s...n_highres.html
Grooby.Club:
My membership over there just ran out, but for instance Becki Bottomz set from 15th Nov 2023 was affected. Just looking at the preview photos at this site, they are also in reduced size.
Hi Sebbie
In the future, spot anything amiss - and email customerservice@grooby.com
You are correct, some of the sets were edited by a newer editor, and they were undersized. His manager should have spotted that, and recitified it immediately and I'm asking them the question why this didn't happen.
They've been told that they have to get all sets fixed immediately and need to work extra time until it's done so.
No excuses.
My apologies.
thanks
Hi Steven,
thanks for your reply. I hope some heads will roll :rolleyes: Nope, just kidding. ;)
I'm just glad the source of the problem could be found and we are now back on high res pics.
Thanks again. :)
PS: I'll try to keep in mind to contact your customerservice, when I find something suspicious again.