Softcore Site?

Is this site becoming soft core? For instance, for the last 24 solo shemales that you featured, how many do you think had legitimate cumshots? Eight out of 24. That's 33%. Not very good. You say that Black T-Girls is the best shemale site. If you think it is you should check other sites and not how many more cumshots they feature.
You have cameramen who constantly stop the girls from cumming. Jack Flash actually told one girl she was having too much fun! Well that's what I'm paying to see!
Come on guys, you gotta do better if you want me to keep paying you. I don't want soft core!

And just to verify my research here are the last 24 solo shoots. Belize (2), Christal, Kim, Courtney Cokks (2), Strawberrie (2), Amanda Coxx, Yony, China (2), Fuchisa Foxx, Bonnie, Yandie Lee, Keymia (2), Kandi Bunz, JLo, Ariel Smith, Bruna Oliver, Sweet Melodii, Toya, and Mimi Dixkz.

The only true comshots were had by Courtney Cox (1), Chins (1), JLo, Ariel Smith, Bruna Oliver, Mimi Dixkz and Toya. That's all.

The little dribble by Kandi Bunz and the one drop from Christal don't count as cumshots in my book.

There is much room for improvement here. Your site used to focus on cumshots now they seem to be a thing of the past. This is very sad!

Hi, this is something we're working to address with the photographers.

Some of the ones you list haven't had their second scenes featured yet, where the cumshot is. Courtney Cokks you count in both categories ;)

That aside we are aware that we were light on cumshots last month and there were serious words for the photographers.
We have implemented stricter controls on this to prevent this happening again.

Thanks

Alexander
Grooby.com

This site is "BLEH"compared to other ts sites. Back during the early to 2000s this site was the SHIT! Nowadays it boring as hell.

I mean how many people post on this forum a day? 1 or 2 every 2-3 days. Why? because Black T-Girls.com have become stale and predictable. Hardcore and 95% of Tgirls bottoming and the way this site edit their solos make 70% of them disappointing unless it's a legend like miss goodbar .

I got some ideas that would put life back to this site but they probably don't wanna hear it.

We welcome constructive criticisms hoodstar, if you have suggestions I'd like to see them.

On a related note, we have started a weekly poll on the site, where you can vote on which model you liked the best.
The results of these polls will be taken into account when shooting new girls and deciding on who can come back for a re-shoot.
So please vote as well -it's your chance to influence the future of the site.

We will have surveys coming, where cumshots is one of the things we will be asking more about.

Thanks

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hoodstar

This site is "BLEH"compared to other ts sites. Back during the early to 2000s this site was the SHIT! Nowadays it boring as hell.

I mean how many people post on this forum a day? 1 or 2 every 2-3 days. Why? because Black T-Girls.com have become stale and predictable. Hardcore and 95% of Tgirls bottoming and the way this site edit their solos make 70% of them disappointing unless it's a legend like miss goodbar .

I got some ideas that would put life back to this site but they probably don't wanna hear it.

---

Let's hear it - put your money where your mouth is.

What would you do different in the edits?
More of the scenes DO have the girls as bottoms, it has always been that way and I make no apologies for that. If you're looking for a site that specializes in guys getting fucked by tgirls, you could probably do better elsewhere.

The forum is a completely different thing and doesn't reflect on the site which has more members and more interactivity on the site than ever before. We've seen it across every porn forum, not just this site and no just trans sites. 10 years ago, before Facebook, Twitter, and other social networks, the forums were the place people used to share common interests. Much of that has now been taken into the social networks, and much like the newsgroups which were around 10 years before the forums, these forums will probably eventually die out with more interest in a instant gratification type network.

So let's hear your ideas and see if any of them are workable?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vincep181

Is this site becoming soft core? For instance, for the last 24 solo shemales that you featured, how many do you think had legitimate cumshots? Eight out of 24. That's 33%. Not very good. You say that Black T-Girls is the best shemale site. If you think it is you should check other sites and not how many more cumshots they feature.
You have cameramen who constantly stop the girls from cumming. Jack Flash actually told one girl she was having too much fun! Well that's what I'm paying to see!
Come on guys, you gotta do better if you want me to keep paying you. I don't want soft core!

And just to verify my research here are the last 24 solo shoots. Belize (2), Christal, Kim, Courtney Cokks (2), Strawberrie (2), Amanda Coxx, Yony, China (2), Fuchisa Foxx, Bonnie, Yandie Lee, Keymia (2), Kandi Bunz, JLo, Ariel Smith, Bruna Oliver, Sweet Melodii, Toya, and Mimi Dixkz.

The only true comshots were had by Courtney Cox (1), Chins (1), JLo, Ariel Smith, Bruna Oliver, Mimi Dixkz and Toya. That's all.

The little dribble by Kandi Bunz and the one drop from Christal don't count as cumshots in my book.

There is much room for improvement here. Your site used to focus on cumshots now they seem to be a thing of the past. This is very sad!

---

I think you're probably a little off in your calculations, we work on this site the same as we've always worked. We shoot two solos of each model, the second set should be the cum shot. Your comment;
"The little dribble by Kandi Bunz and the one drop from Christal don't count as cumshots in my book." is disingenuous. Models on hormones often can only produce a dribble and as long as they can produce an orgasm then they've worked for their money ... it will be a very sad day when someone starts paying someone in the amount that they cum (and it won't be us).

We never used to 'focus on cumshots' - we used to focus on models and that included all aspects of them - the cumshots would have and should have appeared in the second set.
Clearly, there is a problem when too models aren't performing in the second sets and producing a cum shot. It's something we've identified and working on - and we should have changes as early as the end of this month on how to tackle that and ensure that the second sets have a cumshot.

This is nothing new, I've seen this issue come up almost every year - and I don't believe there is another black trans site that shows more cumshots. If you want a cumshot in every set, then we'd have to reduce the amount of sets per week to compensate for that as we just don't have the budget to cover paying for that, and in the poll that has been on the site, it's clear most don't want that.

Thanks
Steven

"You have cameramen who constantly stop the girls from cumming. Jack Flash actually told one girl she was having too much fun! Well that's what I'm paying to see!"

Vincep181.. I know exactly what you are talking about in that situation. It was the models first set and as Steven pointed out the cum shot is reserved for the 2nd set. If the model did cum in the first set you could probably write off the 2nd set, not many models can get or maintain an erection once they have cum, never mind cumming for a 2nd time. It is also in my opinion a way of me easing out and ending the 1st set instead of just coming to an abrupt ending. I often say to the model ok great are you ready to move on and do your next set. This in not intended to be a killjoy, but a transition to say bye see you in my next set for the model.

Yeah I have been told I talk to much and have taken note, again its mostly directed towards making the model feel comfortable and at ease. And thanks for your feedback Vincep181

It makes no sense to offer any input to these guys since they'll only ignore it and defend the status quo. They even threatened to ban me once because I offered CONSTRUCTIVE criticism on a photo set by pointing out how it can be improved upon. And get this...I'm actually a professional photographer and photo-retoucher! My work has been published in magazines, so I know what I'm talking about. I'd think that my criticism would be taken seriously, but no, they threatened to ban me for offering any critique. Your best bet, IMO, would be to stop paying for the service if they're not going to listen to the people who are spending their hard-earned money with them.

Hi Magna Carta,
we do want, and accept constructive criticism. If we gave you a warning it's very likely due to the language used in your comments. If you are unhappy with how a photographer performs tell us why in a polite manner, call her/him names or disparage the model/shoot/photographer and your comment will be deleted. That's not what the comments are for. If you want to offload a rant the forum is the right place for it ;)

Thanks

Alexander Grooby

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magna Carta

It makes no sense to offer any input to these guys since they'll only ignore it and defend the status quo. They even threatened to ban me once because I offered CONSTRUCTIVE criticism on a photo set by pointing out how it can be improved upon. And get this...I'm actually a professional photographer and photo-retoucher! My work has been published in magazines, so I know what I'm talking about. I'd think that my criticism would be taken seriously, but no, they threatened to ban me for offering any critique. Your best bet, IMO, would be to stop paying for the service if they're not going to listen to the people who are spending their hard-earned money with them.

---

Utter rubbish.
If you were asked to stop posting comments on the photosets it was because they were either harrassing/attacking or irrelevant to those sets and we asked you to bring the comments to the forum, where we could answer them further and with relevancy. Like we're doing here.

I've answered all the feedback above either with a reason it's like that, or making changes. You should see a lot less talking in the videos and we've implemented a system to ensure that those second sets DO have cumshots. If there is something that we cannot change, or something I feel a member has gotten wrong, then instead of bullshitting you it will change so we can make more money from you, then we will tell you why it's unlikely to change or why it is like that.

If you are still unhappy with the product that we can deliver, and don't wish to support us trying to produce the best Black Tgirl content we can, then by all means go elsewhere and spend your money.

To reitterate - criticism is taken seriously. All feedback is looked at an answered.
Clear?

Surely BTG is a softcore site, and all the better ! Most models are sexy, they invite you, they're suggestive,you can imagine what you want. Regarding the few hardcore scenes, I have to say that I'm a bit disapointed. Boring.."We kiss each other, I suck you, you suck me, I fuck you (with a condom, of course), and I come on your chest or your ass. End of the story". No surprise. Boring...Another thing I'm thinking of : I know that the girls are not professional actresses, I guess they didn't studied at Actor's studio, and golden globes awards are not intended for. But, photographers, at least, could they make the effort to be concerned about what they're doing , even fake ? Always looking at the camera "well, I'm working now". So, I don't download hardcore scenes on BTG, for that there is a plenty of other sites or forums. Anyways, I'm fan of BTG, I've subscribed several times, and I will continue. Congratulations to all the staff for this excellent site. thanks you, Mr Grooby. P.S : sorry for the bad english

This guy gets what I've been preaching in my past posts. If customers are complaining, especially about what's lacking, why not making changes to cater for the better? Instead, we get a new website design and a new layout for how we receive updates....That is what I perceive to be 'the okey doke" or bullshit. We had a lively forum and now that's gone to shit. It's as if blacktgirls has gone down in stock over the years, so they punish the consumers to compensate. It won't be fun and games for Grooby when I start my own P.O.C Transgender site.

Yeh I've got some suggestions... Keep on doing what you're doing!

I've been subscribing to this site from the very beginning, including buying all the vhs tapes and dvds... For the majority of that time I would regularly email and post on the forum my constructive critism about how I felt this site (and pretty much ALL TS Porn) catered for men who are literally obsessed with cock and cum:

how big is the models cock?
how thick is the models cock?
how hard is the models cock?
how much can she cum?
how many times can she cum?

Str8 men like me, who like TS cock but who are much MUCH more interested in TS Women for their ASS, were pretty much left outside.... Photosets with a hundred pics would only have a couple of spred open ass-shots, and you were lucky if the vids had more than 15 seconds of doggy or missionary pose where the model spread her cheeks and showed off her ass hole inviting you to fuck her, where I could jack off imagining that I could be the lucky guy who she is talking to and teasing and seducing before fucking her... But I kept on paying my re$pect because I had a love/lust for TS models, especially brown-skinned babes like on this site.

It started to get better when photographers like Remy got the models to ENGAGE more with the camera, being more Femme and seductive and posing more in ways that guys could imagine they were fucking the model... But despite this improvement a common feature of the vids would be that the model would then go into what I call "zombie stroke" mode, where she just lies back on the bed/sofa/chair etc and blanky stares into space as she absent-mindedly drone-strokes her cock for the camera.

Many times I would write in and ask/beg/complain for more ASS... I would argue that the models are being relegated to a position where they are represented as no more than a COCK that just happens to have a TS Woman attched to it, when it should be the other way around!... I would make the point that presenting the models in such an extreme niche way alienates the vast majority of str8 guys who want to fuck the models as Women, and want to see them pose (and act/fake if necessary) just like genetic women models do in porn. I would argue that limiting the TS models where they are only valued for their cock (as opposed to their face, eyes, skin, curves, legs, ass etc and of course their character and spirit) is a dead-end road and will limit TS Porn to nothing more than pure niche porn, painting it into a corner next to the midget porn and granny porn...

I do not accept that TS Porn is niche or freaky in that way! Especially not in this more enlightened day and age!

In the last couple of years Grooby sites, especially this one, have become indispensable to guys like me who have a strong attraction to TS Women. Your vids, like the models, are amazing, beautiful, very very Femme, sexy and seductive... The models look at the camera and engage with the viewer, they pose in lingerie, stockings and heels, they dance and move seductively, they lick their lips and play with their ass-hole while saying "fuck me", they stroke their legs and hips and ass and shake their ass nice and slow... And of course, they play with their cocks as well as everything else... Just how it should be.

Seanchai and the rest of the Grooby gang: You guys are at a crossroads now... Please keep doing what you're doing! You will continue to get complaints from guys who only want cock Cock COCK, and who are not seduced by a TS Womans face, beauty, legs, ass and other Feminine powers of seduction... But please consider that the vast majority of str8 guys are into TS Women for the same reasons that they are into ordinary women... Unlike me, they probably wont write in and stick their head above the surface, but we are the quiet majority.

Please don't be diverted by the loud minority who only want to see TS Porn as a pure niche category serving their obsession with COCK.

LET THE TS GIRLS AND WOMEN MODEL THEMSELVES AS GIRLS AND WOMEN!

blueeyeddevil

Oh, and one last thing... Any chance of some more spread-open gaping TS ASS action :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GroobySteven

Utter rubbish.
If you were asked to stop posting comments on the photosets it was because they were either harrassing/attacking or irrelevant to those sets and we asked you to bring the comments to the forum, where we could answer them further and with relevancy. Like we're doing here.

I've answered all the feedback above either with a reason it's like that, or making changes. You should see a lot less talking in the videos and we've implemented a system to ensure that those second sets DO have cumshots. If there is something that we cannot change, or something I feel a member has gotten wrong, then instead of bullshitting you it will change so we can make more money from you, then we will tell you why it's unlikely to change or why it is like that.

If you are still unhappy with the product that we can deliver, and don't wish to support us trying to produce the best Black Tgirl content we can, then by all means go elsewhere and spend your money.

To reitterate - criticism is taken seriously. All feedback is looked at an answered.
Clear?

---

You're a fucking lie. I offered constructive criticism that was neither harassing nor anything else and you (or one of these other mods) threatened to ban me. I wish I could pull up the thread to show you how much of a liar you are but it's not that serious. And for the record, I've never spent one red cent with y'all and never will.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Magna Carta

You're a fucking lie. I offered constructive criticism that was neither harassing nor anything else and you (or one of these other mods) threatened to ban me. I wish I could pull up the thread to show you how much of a liar you are but it's not that serious. And for the record, I've never spent one red cent with y'all and never will.

---

Well that made THAT easy.