Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Softcore Site?

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    8
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 6/3
    Given: 0/0

    Softcore Site?

    Is this site becoming soft core? For instance, for the last 24 solo shemales that you featured, how many do you think had legitimate cumshots? Eight out of 24. That's 33%. Not very good. You say that Black T-Girls is the best shemale site. If you think it is you should check other sites and not how many more cumshots they feature.
    You have cameramen who constantly stop the girls from cumming. Jack Flash actually told one girl she was having too much fun! Well that's what I'm paying to see!
    Come on guys, you gotta do better if you want me to keep paying you. I don't want soft core!

    And just to verify my research here are the last 24 solo shoots. Belize (2), Christal, Kim, Courtney Cokks (2), Strawberrie (2), Amanda Coxx, Yony, China (2), Fuchisa Foxx, Bonnie, Yandie Lee, Keymia (2), Kandi Bunz, JLo, Ariel Smith, Bruna Oliver, Sweet Melodii, Toya, and Mimi Dixkz.

    The only true comshots were had by Courtney Cox (1), Chins (1), JLo, Ariel Smith, Bruna Oliver, Mimi Dixkz and Toya. That's all.

    The little dribble by Kandi Bunz and the one drop from Christal don't count as cumshots in my book.

    There is much room for improvement here. Your site used to focus on cumshots now they seem to be a thing of the past. This is very sad!

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  2. #2
    Grooby Webmaster Alexander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    150
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 49/35
    Given: 3,510/1
    Hi, this is something we're working to address with the photographers.

    Some of the ones you list haven't had their second scenes featured yet, where the cumshot is. Courtney Cokks you count in both categories

    That aside we are aware that we were light on cumshots last month and there were serious words for the photographers.
    We have implemented stricter controls on this to prevent this happening again.

    Thanks

    Alexander
    Grooby.com

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Alexander
    Grooby Webmaster

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    101
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 24/11
    Given: 1/1
    This site is "BLEH"compared to other ts sites. Back during the early to 2000s this site was the SHIT! Nowadays it boring as hell.

    I mean how many people post on this forum a day? 1 or 2 every 2-3 days. Why? because Black T-Girls.com have become stale and predictable. Hardcore and 95% of Tgirls bottoming and the way this site edit their solos make 70% of them disappointing unless it's a legend like miss goodbar .

    I got some ideas that would put life back to this site but they probably don't wanna hear it.

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  4. #4
    Grooby Webmaster Alexander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    150
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 49/35
    Given: 3,510/1
    We welcome constructive criticisms hoodstar, if you have suggestions I'd like to see them.

    On a related note, we have started a weekly poll on the site, where you can vote on which model you liked the best.
    The results of these polls will be taken into account when shooting new girls and deciding on who can come back for a re-shoot.
    So please vote as well -it's your chance to influence the future of the site.

    We will have surveys coming, where cumshots is one of the things we will be asking more about.

    Thanks

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Alexander
    Grooby Webmaster

  5. #5
    All round Grooby Guy GroobySteven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    3,135
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 774/127
    Given: 634/8
    Quote Originally Posted by hoodstar View Post
    This site is "BLEH"compared to other ts sites. Back during the early to 2000s this site was the SHIT! Nowadays it boring as hell.

    I mean how many people post on this forum a day? 1 or 2 every 2-3 days. Why? because Black T-Girls.com have become stale and predictable. Hardcore and 95% of Tgirls bottoming and the way this site edit their solos make 70% of them disappointing unless it's a legend like miss goodbar .

    I got some ideas that would put life back to this site but they probably don't wanna hear it.
    Let's hear it - put your money where your mouth is.

    What would you do different in the edits?
    More of the scenes DO have the girls as bottoms, it has always been that way and I make no apologies for that. If you're looking for a site that specializes in guys getting fucked by tgirls, you could probably do better elsewhere.

    The forum is a completely different thing and doesn't reflect on the site which has more members and more interactivity on the site than ever before. We've seen it across every porn forum, not just this site and no just trans sites. 10 years ago, before Facebook, Twitter, and other social networks, the forums were the place people used to share common interests. Much of that has now been taken into the social networks, and much like the newsgroups which were around 10 years before the forums, these forums will probably eventually die out with more interest in a instant gratification type network.

    So let's hear your ideas and see if any of them are workable?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  6. #6
    All round Grooby Guy GroobySteven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    3,135
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 774/127
    Given: 634/8
    Quote Originally Posted by vincep181 View Post
    Is this site becoming soft core? For instance, for the last 24 solo shemales that you featured, how many do you think had legitimate cumshots? Eight out of 24. That's 33%. Not very good. You say that Black T-Girls is the best shemale site. If you think it is you should check other sites and not how many more cumshots they feature.
    You have cameramen who constantly stop the girls from cumming. Jack Flash actually told one girl she was having too much fun! Well that's what I'm paying to see!
    Come on guys, you gotta do better if you want me to keep paying you. I don't want soft core!

    And just to verify my research here are the last 24 solo shoots. Belize (2), Christal, Kim, Courtney Cokks (2), Strawberrie (2), Amanda Coxx, Yony, China (2), Fuchisa Foxx, Bonnie, Yandie Lee, Keymia (2), Kandi Bunz, JLo, Ariel Smith, Bruna Oliver, Sweet Melodii, Toya, and Mimi Dixkz.

    The only true comshots were had by Courtney Cox (1), Chins (1), JLo, Ariel Smith, Bruna Oliver, Mimi Dixkz and Toya. That's all.

    The little dribble by Kandi Bunz and the one drop from Christal don't count as cumshots in my book.

    There is much room for improvement here. Your site used to focus on cumshots now they seem to be a thing of the past. This is very sad!

    I think you're probably a little off in your calculations, we work on this site the same as we've always worked. We shoot two solos of each model, the second set should be the cum shot. Your comment;
    "The little dribble by Kandi Bunz and the one drop from Christal don't count as cumshots in my book." is disingenuous. Models on hormones often can only produce a dribble and as long as they can produce an orgasm then they've worked for their money ... it will be a very sad day when someone starts paying someone in the amount that they cum (and it won't be us).

    We never used to 'focus on cumshots' - we used to focus on models and that included all aspects of them - the cumshots would have and should have appeared in the second set.
    Clearly, there is a problem when too models aren't performing in the second sets and producing a cum shot. It's something we've identified and working on - and we should have changes as early as the end of this month on how to tackle that and ensure that the second sets have a cumshot.

    This is nothing new, I've seen this issue come up almost every year - and I don't believe there is another black trans site that shows more cumshots. If you want a cumshot in every set, then we'd have to reduce the amount of sets per week to compensate for that as we just don't have the budget to cover paying for that, and in the poll that has been on the site, it's clear most don't want that.

    Thanks
    Steven

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    25
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 1/0
    Given: 0/0
    "You have cameramen who constantly stop the girls from cumming. Jack Flash actually told one girl she was having too much fun! Well that's what I'm paying to see!"

    Vincep181.. I know exactly what you are talking about in that situation. It was the models first set and as Steven pointed out the cum shot is reserved for the 2nd set. If the model did cum in the first set you could probably write off the 2nd set, not many models can get or maintain an erection once they have cum, never mind cumming for a 2nd time. It is also in my opinion a way of me easing out and ending the 1st set instead of just coming to an abrupt ending. I often say to the model ok great are you ready to move on and do your next set. This in not intended to be a killjoy, but a transition to say bye see you in my next set for the model.

    Yeah I have been told I talk to much and have taken note, again its mostly directed towards making the model feel comfortable and at ease. And thanks for your feedback Vincep181

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    58
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 15/3
    Given: 4/0
    It makes no sense to offer any input to these guys since they'll only ignore it and defend the status quo. They even threatened to ban me once because I offered CONSTRUCTIVE criticism on a photo set by pointing out how it can be improved upon. And get this...I'm actually a professional photographer and photo-retoucher! My work has been published in magazines, so I know what I'm talking about. I'd think that my criticism would be taken seriously, but no, they threatened to ban me for offering any critique. Your best bet, IMO, would be to stop paying for the service if they're not going to listen to the people who are spending their hard-earned money with them.

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

  9. #9
    Grooby Webmaster Alexander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    150
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 49/35
    Given: 3,510/1
    Hi Magna Carta,
    we do want, and accept constructive criticism. If we gave you a warning it's very likely due to the language used in your comments. If you are unhappy with how a photographer performs tell us why in a polite manner, call her/him names or disparage the model/shoot/photographer and your comment will be deleted. That's not what the comments are for. If you want to offload a rant the forum is the right place for it

    Thanks

    Alexander Grooby

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
    Alexander
    Grooby Webmaster

  10. #10
    All round Grooby Guy GroobySteven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    3,135
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 774/127
    Given: 634/8
    Quote Originally Posted by Magna Carta View Post
    It makes no sense to offer any input to these guys since they'll only ignore it and defend the status quo. They even threatened to ban me once because I offered CONSTRUCTIVE criticism on a photo set by pointing out how it can be improved upon. And get this...I'm actually a professional photographer and photo-retoucher! My work has been published in magazines, so I know what I'm talking about. I'd think that my criticism would be taken seriously, but no, they threatened to ban me for offering any critique. Your best bet, IMO, would be to stop paying for the service if they're not going to listen to the people who are spending their hard-earned money with them.
    Utter rubbish.
    If you were asked to stop posting comments on the photosets it was because they were either harrassing/attacking or irrelevant to those sets and we asked you to bring the comments to the forum, where we could answer them further and with relevancy. Like we're doing here.

    I've answered all the feedback above either with a reason it's like that, or making changes. You should see a lot less talking in the videos and we've implemented a system to ensure that those second sets DO have cumshots. If there is something that we cannot change, or something I feel a member has gotten wrong, then instead of bullshitting you it will change so we can make more money from you, then we will tell you why it's unlikely to change or why it is like that.

    If you are still unhappy with the product that we can deliver, and don't wish to support us trying to produce the best Black Tgirl content we can, then by all means go elsewhere and spend your money.

    To reitterate - criticism is taken seriously. All feedback is looked at an answered.
    Clear?

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Customer Service and Password Support

About Grooby  |   $$ Webmasters $$  |   Want to Model?  |   Report Piracy!  |   Spam Policy  |  




© GroobyForum.com - Any misuse, unauthorised use or copyright infringement of these images whatsoever will be met by criminal and civil litigations WITHOUT FAIL.


Copyright holders send DMCA notifications to admin@grooby.com