Great site! ideas for improvement.

[Cam Brazille]

Definitely more cock close-up photos and video. Also, it's good when the photographers are able to bring out the girl's personality. Nothings worse on this site than a boring shoot with goofy questions from a photog and girls who won't talk or hardly talk at all.

Also, there are too many girls who've obviously have just started transitioning and are nothing more than tvs. I'd rather see updates on the best of the best than some chick who just started transitioning a month ago and is confused as hell about her sexuality and just might go back to being a li'l boy in another month.

There are probably perhaps about 100 girls on this site that really bring in the bacon and keep us cummin' back for more. Now that Grooby and this site are well established, PLEASE update the most popular girls on the regular and let the tv and ittybittytittycommitee go elsewhere.

Geez! O.k., o.k., please stop beating me over my head because I responded to sureferja's original question about suggestions for improving this site. I wasn't aware that my suggestions had to be politically correct and in agreement with admin's. One little comment, pun intended, about ittybittytitties has led to a well-taken lecture. I'm sorry I ever typed it. Besides, looking in my 'Personal Portfolio' I see SEVERAL girls with small and ittybittytitties and I LIKE 'em! [The girls, that is.]

I'm not going to name any names in order to avoid another possible round of replies and another possible lecture. But suffice it to say that many, I'm sure, are among the most popular on this site, including many Models of the Month, and are among those who are "bringing in the bacon". And in fact, I do know some personally or have met some and although tits don't make the t-girl, the before and after affect is usually an enhancement.

So to ALL the small-breasted and ittybittytitty girls, and to those in the early stages of transition, PLEASE keep modeling here and elsewhere and showin' us ALL your goodies!

Humbled and more mellowed, thanks to all,

Cam Brazille

[TBisca/Leopard]

Ho-fucking-hum - this old chestnut again.
We don't put filler on this site, we handpick every model and if some look better than others, or some are more beginners than others, than that's because that's what we do. We don't feature TV's. We feature tgirls and the majority of them are transgenders in some stages of the process of being a transsexual. Yes some girls are more at the beginning of their transition than others but it's through sites like this and Shemale Yum that we've found many of the most exciting TG models, many of whom have developed with the site into the more polished model.
By taking a wide range of models it not only enables us to work with some of the best new models but also encourages many younger and beginner tgirls to continue on the path and to continue to model. Sure, not all models we choose end up being hits. Many don't look or perform as well as we thought they had - but almost every model we work with, at the time of shooting or submitting their application, deserved a go.

"Attractive" is subjective. Don't be ignorant by thinking everyone has the same tastes as you or because some doesn't have tits then she must by a TV. If you want quality over quantity, then you are still getting it here as I don't see any other sites uploading this amount of quality black tgirls over a month.

Well, you own the site, obviously, and can do and say whatever you please. More power to you. I agree that "'attractive' is subjective;" that's why when you open the pages of Vogue or Playboy or the Victoria's Secret catalog, you see morbidly obese girls and skinny girls and knock-kneed men in frocks and . . . oh, wait . . . .

What's the opinion of one or two or three paying customers? Those who bother to voice their opinions probably don't represent lots of other customers and potential customers who don't give their opinion. If they don't like it they can start their own damn site, right? No need for an "Ideas for improvement" thread.

It's actually kind of cool in a way that you respond to suggestions you don't agree with by browbeating the customers who make them. Kind of like the sushi nazi but with porn. Definitely a unique approach to business.

Anyway, I see your point about giving girls a chance to develop. That does make sense.

[GroobySteven]

Well, you own the site, obviously, and can do and say whatever you please. More power to you. I agree that "'attractive' is subjective;" that's why when you open the pages of Vogue or Playboy or the Victoria's Secret catalog, you see morbidly obese girls and skinny girls and knock-kneed men in frocks and . . . oh, wait . . . .

What's the opinion of one or two or three paying customers? Those who bother to voice their opinions probably don't represent lots of other customers and potential customers who don't give their opinion. If they don't like it they can start their own damn site, right? No need for an "Ideas for improvement" thread.

It's actually kind of cool in a way that you respond to suggestions you don't agree with by browbeating the customers who make them. Kind of like the sushi nazi but with porn. Definitely a unique approach to business.

Anyway, I see your point about giving girls a chance to develop. That does make sense.

We are not Playboy or Victoria Secret catalogues - that's the point!
There isn't enough paying customers to support a number of niche sites for Black transgenders. It's fairly direct niche, already and a small slice of the transgender niche in total. So by bringing them all in one place, we're able to run a site that caters to multiple tastes and desires. Sure not every girl in every update is going to be your type - but when I open Playboy, it's the same.

Although I do welcome feedback and we've made a lot of changes on the site over the last few years or longer, because of customers requests, we're not going to change the ethos of what the site was built on and showcases over 300 model sets a year for the past 12 yrs, which is the diversity of content. Every paying customer is listened to and responded to but it's the masses who keep paying, who comment or rate models and who keep this site going who are the most important. It's funny, that should I disagree with your comment, you call me a Nazi ... yet you are the one that is discriminating against models on their body size or shape.

Looking at the Top 20 list I just put up - under your "guidelines" some of those models would never have been photographed in the first place and therefore, never have came back for reshoots and their current popularity.

[Ms Remy M]

Well, you own the site, obviously, and can do and say whatever you please. More power to you. I agree that "'attractive' is subjective;" that's why when you open the pages of Vogue or Playboy or the Victoria's Secret catalog, you see morbidly obese girls and skinny girls and knock-kneed men in frocks and . . . oh, wait . . . .

What's the opinion of one or two or three paying customers? Those who bother to voice their opinions probably don't represent lots of other customers and potential customers who don't give their opinion. If they don't like it they can start their own damn site, right? No need for an "Ideas for improvement" thread.

It's actually kind of cool in a way that you respond to suggestions you don't agree with by browbeating the customers who make them. Kind of like the sushi nazi but with porn. Definitely a unique approach to business.

Anyway, I see your point about giving girls a chance to develop. That does make sense.

That's a stupid comparison, Vogue and Victoria Secret don't show nudity or cater to the Trans community, and Playboy features almost identical girls issue after issue. Despite all that, look how few publications they do a year. So you are saying you'd rather us only update once a month and only feature the best of the best, in a more High Fashion upscale approach instead of in raunchy, kinky, and naughty fun? Actually, that's an idea I've had for a while, but haven't figured out a way for it to make money. So honestly how many of you would pay to see the girls clothed only when you can see them naked on other sites?

If you are going to compare us to another company at least make it a company that exclusively features Black Tgirls. Oh wait... there aren't many, and those that do exist primarily show Brasilians as the bulk of their content with a few sporadic shoots of American Black Tgirls here and there, and don't have nearly the archives we do, with the exception of Black Tranny Whackers which are doing their thing. I, for one, don't think those other sites will even last long, maybe another year or two, and you may get 10 American Black girls if your lucky in that time.

[Cam Brazille]

That's a stupid comparison, Vogue and Victoria Secret don't show nudity or cater to the Trans community, and Playboy features almost identical girls issue after issue. Despite all that, look how few publications they do a year. So you are saying you'd rather us only update once a month and only feature the best of the best, in a more High Fashion upscale approach instead of in raunchy, kinky, and naughty fun? Actually, that's an idea I've had for a while, but haven't figured out a way for it to make money. So honestly how many of you would pay to see the girls clothed only when you can see them naked on other sites?

If you are going to compare us to another company at least make it a company that exclusively features Black Tgirls. Oh wait... there aren't many, and those that do exist primarily show Brasilians as the bulk of their content with a few sporadic shoots of American Black Tgirls here and there, and don't have nearly the archives we do, with the exception of Black Tranny Whackers which are doing their thing. I, for one, don't think those other sites will even last long, maybe another year or two, and you may get 10 American Black girls if your lucky in that time.

PLAYBOY??? PLAYBOY!!! PLAYBOY??? Did someone mention PLAYBOY??? Talk about a real snooze that could use some beautiful chicks with dicks to save itself! With the financial ups and downs of that company, it sure would be nice if Hef would get real and embrace the beauty of t-girl cock, too!

Well, I guess he's liberal, but not THAT liberal! But I wouldn't be surprised if ol' Hef's taken a peep now 'n then.

But, of course, it is his company and his magazine for the most part, and his rollercoaster revenue stream as well all because he wants to continue with a 'girl next door' facade. Yeah right......how many of your neighbors are well into their senior years and living with three 'playmates'?

One of the things that I love most about this site is that, because of its large archive, every time I log-on I see photos and more often than not videos of girls that I've overlooked through the years, and it's like discovering them for the very first time.

Diversity is a great thing. PLEASE Grooby, keep 'em cumming!!!

[Ms Remy M]

PLAYBOY??? PLAYBOY!!! PLAYBOY??? Did someone mention PLAYBOY??? Talk about a real snooze that could use some beautiful chicks with dicks to save itself! With the financial ups and downs of that company, it sure would be nice if Hef would get real and embrace the beauty of t-girl cock, too!

Well, I guess he's liberal, but not THAT liberal! But I wouldn't be surprised if ol' Hef's taken a peep now 'n then.

But, of course, it is his company and his magazine for the most part, and his rollercoaster revenue stream as well all because he wants to continue with a 'girl next door' facade. Yeah right......how many of your neighbors are well into their senior years and living with three 'playmates'?

One of the things that I love most about this site is that, because of its large archive, every time I log-on I see photos and more often than not videos of girls that I've overlooked through the years, and it's like discovering them for the very first time.

Diversity is a great thing. PLEASE Grooby, keep 'em cumming!!!

To be fair, Playboy has, on very rare occasions, featured transexuals (once or twice I think). And Hef doesn't actually run Playboy anymore, he just sits back and reaps the benefits of his daughters continued work for the company if I recall correctly. On the bright side, I'm all for the girls running the company and bringing a whole new level of respect to the business that can't be matched by the other sex. No offense guys

[GroobySteven]

To be fair, Playboy has, on very rare occasions, featured transexuals (once or twice I think). And Hef doesn't actually run Playboy anymore, he just sits back and reaps the benefits of his daughters continued work for the company if I recall correctly. On the bright side, I'm all for the girls running the company and bringing a whole new level of respect to the business that can't be matched by the other sex. No offense guys

I don't think Playboy has featured transsexuals? Hustler has.
Playboy is in BIG financial trouble, they didn't adapt to new technology fast or well enough.

[Ms Remy M]

Opps, I stand corrected, I knew it was one of those biggies, way to go Flynt

Yeah a lot of companies got hit hard by not jumping on the Internet bandwagon quick enough. I have my 3D specs ready for the next big tech sweep!

[Cam Brazille]

PLAYBOY once featured a post-op actress by the name of Tula in the 90's, but none with all the goodies. You'll find Tula at Transcelebs.com.