PDA

View Full Version : new tranny fetish??????



pipeahoe
08-05-2009, 01:18 AM
:mad::confused::confused::confused:wow is this the newly commercialized tranny fetish

this says alot...just my opinion!

http://www.deviantclip.com/Media-48741_Extreme-Black-Tranny-Abuse.html

thookie
08-05-2009, 01:39 AM
Damn that's abused black shemales

Tony Vee
08-05-2009, 01:56 AM
Not my thing at all!.....You'll never see me shooting stuff like that....not a turn on at all for me.
:cool:

barrym
08-05-2009, 04:20 AM
I agree. That's a little too much for me. I actually cut it off halfway throuth.

bigdicki
08-05-2009, 12:05 PM
I guess I am not dominant in bed if that's what "dominant" means nowadays. That was just not my cup of tea. I see why tgirls, especially BLACK tgirls, wouldn't do something like THAT. I don't have fantasies about beating the shit outta tgirls and r**ing them. Just my humble opinion. :rolleyes:

TurboMan
08-06-2009, 02:03 AM
not My Thing At All!.....you'll Never See Me Shooting Stuff Like That....not A Turn On At All For Me.
:cool:
I Agree Tony.....not My Cup Of Tea Either.....damn Sho Wouln't Waste My Paper On Any Site Like That One....hell to Da Naw!!!

TSSexyChanel
08-06-2009, 06:20 AM
Stuff like this gives the BDSM lifestyle a bad rep.

BlkMuscleTop
08-06-2009, 01:42 PM
Stuff like this gives the BDSM lifestyle a bad rep.

I'm not even going to front, I'm a straight up freak and love sexy black tgirls and fucking the shit out of them. Having checked out some of the clips from Black Tranny Abuse, its pretty lame, I mean I don't get the whole spittling in the face, smeared lipstick, faux suffication, all that is just a wee, tad bit over the top. :)

The honies aren't even tied with the rope firmly, its more of a loop around their hands that come apart when they move. :)

I could just do with the anal penetration scenes and leave it be. All the rest is tacky. Not much imagination left in porn today I guess.

DYNACORD
08-06-2009, 10:29 PM
That would be a "NO"! I watched just the Trailer and that was too much. I like being a little rough when the feeling is right, but that shit looks down right mean. I know a friend of mine in NY state that's a "Dungeon Master" and he didn't care for it ether. To each his own I guess.

Markham
08-07-2009, 08:56 AM
that was too much.

bigdicki
08-08-2009, 01:29 AM
That would be a "NO"! I watched just the Trailer and that was too much. I like being a little rough when the feeling is right, but that shit looks down right mean. I know a friend of mine in NY state that's a "Dungeon Master" and he didn't care for it ether. To each his own I guess.

If anybody who is a "Dungeon Master" says its wild, then I'm gonna guess most people are going to say its a bit sick. ;)

carmencream
08-08-2009, 07:02 PM
I really hope they were paid well lol because they were straight up clowned better them than me, some like it a little rough but that was really taking it overboard hope it does'nt catch on in the states

johnmagnum
08-09-2009, 04:51 AM
not my style. but i know a couple of trannys like like it ruff!

TSSexyChanel
08-18-2009, 08:03 PM
I'm not even going to front, I'm a straight up freak and love sexy black tgirls and fucking the shit out of them. Having checked out some of the clips from Black Tranny Abuse, its pretty lame, I mean I don't get the whole spittling in the face, smeared lipstick, faux suffication, all that is just a wee, tad bit over the top. :)

The honies aren't even tied with the rope firmly, its more of a loop around their hands that come apart when they move. :)

I could just do with the anal penetration scenes and leave it be. All the rest is tacky. Not much imagination left in porn today I guess.

Thats it right there grasping for straws and tryin to push the evelope but its a utter fail. I am an extreme domme and I think most of whats there is just a tacky farce of the true BDSM lifestyle

TSSexyChanel
08-18-2009, 08:05 PM
not my style. but i know a couple of trannys like like it ruff!

Ruff and disgusting are two different animals LOL

TVSURFER
08-23-2009, 10:21 AM
A new Tranny fetish, I’m not getting this thread? Wasn’t there a thread of a similar title a while back that suggested to see black t-girls on the other end of domination? Trans-Domination just introduced a t-girl girl being humiliated by a guy, and that’s okay? Oh, she was just one of your favorites!
Some of you like the site Trans-Domination because you like to see your favorite t-girl stars, humiliating some poor sap, and that’s alright? What’s the difference between the two sites, Trans-Domination and Abused Black Trannies? I feel a lot of you folks here like to see your words in print. Oh, that’s right; it doesn’t matter because one site has your favorite t-girl stars and the other is just a link!
To view this site, Abused Black Trannies, what I saw was rather mild as compared to what is really out there. The site used Brazilian she-male porn stock actors, a considerable length of hardware rope and chains, as compared to the custom harnesses, whips and straps used in Trans-Domination. Did anybody notice how the girls were following a script? They didn’t look abused to me. The shit wasn’t that serious! Anyway, what’s the difference? Oh, favorite t-girl stars, right?
Grooby can pander BDSM, but some of you find a stacked deck of scripted, Brazilian unknowns, trying to crack the porn stardom ceiling as disgusting! Spitting in the mouth? Is it as disgusting as a babe getting a shot of Bull Milk in her face or mouth? What’s the difference or is it just something to talk about? Talk about trying on the high hat! All of us are freaks in one way or another. If most your families and friends found out that you like to look at a site of [men] in make-up, wigs, high-heels, with rusty knees, and big fat, blood engorged schlongs in front of a camera, they would say you’re were disgusting and sick, too. It blows my mind that some of you are being so judgmental about this. C’mon people, you can’t have it both ways!
This is a marketing ploy; a “sniff” out to see what the air is like in this genre: People who want to see Black T-girls being abused! They’re just trying to capitalize on what could be or is a lucrative, niche market. However, once you engage yourself to the site, you can rest assured you’ll be prompted to check out other links that will take you as far as the rabbit hole goes.
:cool:

TSSexyChanel
08-26-2009, 05:28 PM
A new Tranny fetish, I’m not getting this thread? Wasn’t there a thread of a similar title a while back that suggested to see black t-girls on the other end of domination? Trans-Domination just introduced a t-girl girl being humiliated by a guy, and that’s okay? Oh, she was just one of your favorites!
Some of you like the site Trans-Domination because you like to see your favorite t-girl stars, humiliating some poor sap, and that’s alright? What’s the difference between the two sites, Trans-Domination and Abused Black Trannies? I feel a lot of you folks here like to see your words in print. Oh, that’s right; it doesn’t matter because one site has your favorite t-girl stars and the other is just a link!
To view this site, Abused Black Trannies, what I saw was rather mild as compared to what is really out there. The site used Brazilian she-male porn stock actors, a considerable length of hardware rope and chains, as compared to the custom harnesses, whips and straps used in Trans-Domination. Did anybody notice how the girls were following a script? They didn’t look abused to me. The shit wasn’t that serious! Anyway, what’s the difference? Oh, favorite t-girl stars, right?
Grooby can pander BDSM, but some of you find a stacked deck of scripted, Brazilian unknowns, trying to crack the porn stardom ceiling as disgusting! Spitting in the mouth? Is it as disgusting as a babe getting a shot of Bull Milk in her face or mouth? What’s the difference or is it just something to talk about? Talk about trying on the high hat! All of us are freaks in one way or another. If most your families and friends found out that you like to look at a site of [men] in make-up, wigs, high-heels, with rusty knees, and big fat, blood engorged schlongs in front of a camera, they would say you’re were disgusting and sick, too. It blows my mind that some of you are being so judgmental about this. C’mon people, you can’t have it both ways!
This is a marketing ploy; a “sniff” out to see what the air is like in this genre: People who want to see Black T-girls being abused! They’re just trying to capitalize on what could be or is a lucrative, niche market. However, once you engage yourself to the site, you can rest assured you’ll be prompted to check out other links that will take you as far as the rabbit hole goes.
:cool:

Did I ever tell you how much I find intelligence to be a turn on. Talk about a hot bed of hypocrisy. Reason 1 my interactions on most of the "trannie sites and forums " is so very limited. I still think that shit is disgusting but not because the people are unattractive cause its a farce of the BDSM lifestyle I enjoy

bigdicki
08-29-2009, 03:38 AM
A new Tranny fetish, I’m not getting this thread? Wasn’t there a thread of a similar title a while back that suggested to see black t-girls on the other end of domination? Trans-Domination just introduced a t-girl girl being humiliated by a guy, and that’s okay? Oh, she was just one of your favorites!
Some of you like the site Trans-Domination because you like to see your favorite t-girl stars, humiliating some poor sap, and that’s alright? What’s the difference between the two sites, Trans-Domination and Abused Black Trannies? I feel a lot of you folks here like to see your words in print. Oh, that’s right; it doesn’t matter because one site has your favorite t-girl stars and the other is just a link!
To view this site, Abused Black Trannies, what I saw was rather mild as compared to what is really out there. The site used Brazilian she-male porn stock actors, a considerable length of hardware rope and chains, as compared to the custom harnesses, whips and straps used in Trans-Domination. Did anybody notice how the girls were following a script? They didn’t look abused to me. The shit wasn’t that serious! Anyway, what’s the difference? Oh, favorite t-girl stars, right?
Grooby can pander BDSM, but some of you find a stacked deck of scripted, Brazilian unknowns, trying to crack the porn stardom ceiling as disgusting! Spitting in the mouth? Is it as disgusting as a babe getting a shot of Bull Milk in her face or mouth? What’s the difference or is it just something to talk about? Talk about trying on the high hat! All of us are freaks in one way or another. If most your families and friends found out that you like to look at a site of [men] in make-up, wigs, high-heels, with rusty knees, and big fat, blood engorged schlongs in front of a camera, they would say you’re were disgusting and sick, too. It blows my mind that some of you are being so judgmental about this. C’mon people, you can’t have it both ways!
This is a marketing ploy; a “sniff” out to see what the air is like in this genre: People who want to see Black T-girls being abused! They’re just trying to capitalize on what could be or is a lucrative, niche market. However, once you engage yourself to the site, you can rest assured you’ll be prompted to check out other links that will take you as far as the rabbit hole goes.
:cool:

One of the few times we slightly disagree. I agree on the fact that it is a valid type of porn: the people in it are adults and have agreed to do it. On the other hand, the people who view it, want to see it and can choose to do so of their own volition. BUT where we disagree is saying that that is some wack, disgusting shit is putting on the high hat. It's our own particular picadillos that guide what we think is hot and what is shit. Some people will probably think what I do/have done is disgusting.... no I KNOW they will think its disgusting. But thats their bag... just like thinking that site is some bullshit is mine. :cool:

TVSURFER
08-29-2009, 01:02 PM
One of the few times we slightly disagree. I agree on the fact that it is a valid type of porn: the people in it are adults and have agreed to do it. On the other hand, the people who view it, want to see it and can choose to do so of their own volition. BUT where we disagree is saying that that is some wack, disgusting shit is putting on the high hat. It's our own particular picadillos that guide what we think is hot and what is shit. Some people will probably think what I do/have done is disgusting.... no I KNOW they will think its disgusting. But thats their bag... just like thinking that site is some bullshit is mine. :cool:
If you would have thought about what the original post endorsed, it would have given you pause to reflect. What’s so new about this? From reading the comments, I surmised that some of you were saying shit just to be talking (if the shoe fits…)! There was no elaboration in the comments of why this site and its contents were disgusting! What’s the difference, which was my question?
The original post questioned this as a new fetish, right? Well, I saw there was nothing new about the original assertion and I sought to illustrate the distinction. Whether you agree with me or not is your personal blend of the subject, just as I said most of you want to see your words in print; I say potato and you say potatoe? Or, what’s the monetary difference between a nickel and five pennies? It also leads me to believe some don’t fully grasp what the organ under your hair is for (if the shoe fits...). Cavemen didn’t know fire would burn them until they touched it. After they licked their wound, they had a new appreciation of the flickering, hot substance. They started using the brain for its intended purpose. They could rationalize that fire kept them warmer than the skins they wore. If they were asked the difference between hot and cold they would have a lucid and coherent answer.
I rationalized there wasn’t a difference between Abused Black Trannies and Trans-Domination. I saw nothing new in the content of the post; nothing new at all. Or, to paraphrase an old axiom: “The faces have been changed, but the look is the same!”
:cool:

peggygee
08-30-2009, 04:35 AM
Hell to the no. http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l2/magi43/smh2.gif

And don't let it be some white person doing the abuse, then there's gonna be a Nat Turner up-rising moment,


http://cwmemory.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/Nat_Turner_woodcut.jpg

peggygee
08-30-2009, 04:53 AM
If you would have thought about what the original post endorsed, it would have given you pause to reflect. What’s so new about this? From reading the comments, I surmised that some of you were saying shit just to be talking (if the shoe fits…)! There was no elaboration in the comments of why this site and its contents were disgusting! What’s the difference, which was my question?
The original post questioned this as a new fetish, right? Well, I saw there was nothing new about the original assertion and I sought to illustrate the distinction. Whether you agree with me or not is your personal blend of the subject, just as I said most of you want to see your words in print; I say potato and you say potatoe? Or, what’s the monetary difference between a nickel and five pennies? It also leads me to believe some don’t fully grasp what the organ under your hair is for (if the shoe fits...). Cavemen didn’t know fire would burn them until they touched it. After they licked their wound, they had a new appreciation of the flickering, hot substance. They started using the brain for its intended purpose. They could rationalize that fire kept them warmer than the skins they wore. If they were asked the difference between hot and cold they would have a lucid and coherent answer.
I rationalized there wasn’t a difference between Abused Black Trannies and Trans-Domination. I saw nothing new in the content of the post; nothing new at all. Or, to paraphrase an old axiom: “The faces have been changed, but the look is the same!”
:cool:

From timr to time, discussions come up in regard to BDSM to, my answer then is as it is now.

I am a Black woman, and I don't desire to.have whips, handcuffs or other forms of bondage utilized in sexual activity with me.

However, conversely I could engage in the afore-mentioned, plus water sports and a host of other activities in a sexual encounter wirh a person of the cacausion persusian, and them being them recipient.

DYNACORD
08-30-2009, 06:23 PM
From timr to time, discussions come up in regard to BDSM to, my answer then is as it is now.

I am a Black woman, and I don't desire to.have whips, handcuffs or other forms of bondage utilized in sexual activity with me.

However, conversely I could engage in the afore-mentioned, plus water sports and a host of other activities in a sexual encounter wirh a person of the cacausion persusian, and them being them recipient.

Say What????? Sounds like you may have issues! Or just a deviant side?

peggygee
08-30-2009, 09:08 PM
Say What????? Sounds like you may have issues! Or just a deviant side?

Yeah it's funny, I have no problem being a domme to a white guy, but wouldn't
want to dominate any other ethnicity.

And as I stated, no BDSM on me from any race.

Okay, maybe a little smacking on the ass, hair pulling, role playing, water
sports, but that's it. :p

anonymoussonny
10-25-2009, 06:01 AM
The condemnation of this 'new fetish' is hypocrisy at its best. If you dont like it, dont subscribe to the site.

How many people have entered Black TGirls and had the same repulsive feelings you voiced regarding this topic.

Can the pot call the kettle black?