Hyperfemininity and Hypersexualization and trans attracted men (This be deep muh nig)

lovely response. I definitely agree with D.


I remember in one of my videos, some white girl told me i should loose weight. lol. It's interesting hearing all of these different standards of beauty. It makes for an interesting character study, I think.

There are most definitely different standards within race. I wonder if that has to do with the whole though that if she's big, she can cook or at least pay for people ot cook for her. I've seen a lot of scrawny guys with big women.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kittymatthews

lovely response. I definitely agree with D.


I remember in one of my videos, some white girl told me i should loose weight. lol. It's interesting hearing all of these different standards of beauty. It makes for an interesting character study, I think.

There are most definitely different standards within race. I wonder if that has to do with the whole though that if she's big, she can cook or at least pay for people ot cook for her. I've seen a lot of scrawny guys with big women.

---

well i think the latter point u made is semi accurate. When i see soemoen with size i think they can cook better (albeit unhealthier lol). Some people just have better metabolisms and genes.

THis is the internet so gawking over the unnatural is what it's for.

Meanwhile back to really my women tend revolve around a more traditional 34-26-38 measurement.

Since in my experience all that extra, extra ass and tits is overrated.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kittymatthews

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Baartman

She was basically a woman who was captured in Africa who was put on exibit all across the world for her naturally "sexual" features. She's viewed as the tragic case where white men defined what made her sexual and then went and used those outlining things to overgeneralize the sexuality and sexual availability of a black woman based on her body.

---

Better yet see "Medical Apartheid" by Harriet Washington for a more in depth take on the atrocious exploitation of this South African sista as well as black folk in general all in the name of "science". A startling and alarming read for sure.

http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...clqYhx5FbyeEM2

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bxboy1984

D- I think black women have a different set of beauty rules then white women, hence why Hot en Taut Venus was such a spectacle to white people in her time. To us, curves and, for lack of a better term, meat is not only acceptable but sought after, where in many caucasian cultures thin is in. Black women, imo, carry weight better than most white women and ppull off the thick look easier, especially in the hip area, where white women just look better top heavy. Each culture has its own kind of distinguishing and appealing features and black women in america is leaning more to thick than anything else.

---

This might be controversial, but there is a theory of sexual selection that tries to explain why people (and animals in general) select each other by some set of traits. It supposedly helps explain racial differences between populations which were isolated geographically over long periods of time. The theory says that we select on certain features being a certain way, even though they confer no obvious advantage, and these partly define a standard of beauty which is an arbitrary component of the standard. (One component is fairly objective: traits like symmetry, health of the skin, posture, strength; but this is an arbitrary standard that selects on some irrelevant traits.) Take for example the nose. One culture may favor a bulbous nose as a standard of beauty. Being able to grow a bulbous nose demonstrates that the body has sufficient extra resources to "waste" them on such an extravagance. The same thing happens in the animal kingdom and provides the classic explanation for why male peacocks with elaborate (and wasteful) tails are favored by females. If the organism has enough biological resources to waste them on these arbitrary traits that are favored by the opposite sex, it demonstrates an underlying health and vigor. Over time, those features tend to remain in the population since the animals which possess them are more likely to pass on their genes. And so this may partly explain "exaggerated" features like huge buttocks and breasts, or even features we take for granted like dark skin versus light skin. Of course, the explanations are always more complex in the end. Like why is there transexuality (not at explained by this aspect of the theory).

ooooo all this darwinism is making me horny.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kittymatthews

ooooo all this darwinism is making me horny.

---

That's funny. But knowledge (or the attempt at it) usually stimulates a different side of me from sexuality. Very different, but often quite satisfying.

You didn't take my bait. I was hinting (at the end) at a next topic. Perhaps you should start a thread on why there is transexuality, starting with your own thoughts on the subject. At least people like to reply to your threads !

We shouldn't question our own existence. We just are.