what's the criteria for black tgirls...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CosmicTraveler

I wasn't aware that the site had been around for so long. But I think Vidman has a point. This topic is really touchy. However One could argue about why the caucasian t-girls have to share their site with all other races while the Asians, Blacks and Brazilians all have their own site. Does it sound ridiculous?

It should.

The thing is, the sites have been set up to appeal to certain demographics. Are we going to pitch a fit because Justin Bieber isn't targeting black males as his audience? I hope not.

But, I suppose to answer the original question, there is no real criteria for a black t-girl's appearance on Shemale Yum. On one hand you have light skinned girls like Denise something who was mentioned earlier and on the other you have dark girls like Lisa Cage. So... I guess the criteria is how well shemale yum viewers will react... as Remy said earlier I believe. I'm really just reiterating points here without all the... anger.

---

Beautiful point and well stated, Cosmo. Nice!

Thanks Vidman.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrKnockOut

would u put a non black tg on btg if she identified herself as black or as 'urban/hip hop'?

Since u brought up the issue of self identification

I know when it comes to business, a lot of blacks will choose to self identify as other or mixed because its deemed advantagous. Shits been going on since the days of slavery.

---

A white girl on black tgirls?!? Sorry, I couldn't resist :) :p

http://www.black-tgirls.com/members/...e=Hazel+Tucker

Now who doesn't like a little white chocolate every now and again... :)

Maybe getting Hazel to pair up with one of the models would be interesting... Luxury... I'm lookin' at you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CosmicTraveler

Maybe getting Hazel to pair up with one of the models would be interesting... Luxury... I'm lookin' at you.

---

Excellent idea! :cool:

I think so. It's something for everyone I suppose. If I recall, seeing Natassia Dreams go at it with Kimber James was something else. So having something like that on this site would definitely draw a crowd.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Remy757Photog

A white girl on black tgirls?!? Sorry, I couldn't resist :) :p

http://www.black-tgirls.com/members/...e=Hazel+Tucker

Now who doesn't like a little white chocolate every now and again... :)

---

White chocolate? A true oxymoron if there ever was one!
Ooooo Weeeee, What's up with that, wassup wit dat? :cool:

I remember when the original Yum first got split up, BTG and the ladyboy sites being among the first spinoffs, if I recall correctly. And I was a little sad because it meant I'd have to pay more to see all that content. But from the business POV, that was exactly the idea: make more money ! And if you've got a ton of content, that's a sensible way to split it up. I think that for the consumers it has more to do with PREFERENCE -- there's nothing deeply sinister about which category of site a customer would join. At least that's how it is with me. Likewise I doubt there's anything more going on than dividing the content by preference.

A comment about d-league: those are extraordinary basketball players. For the girls selected to do porn, at least a lot of guys want to see them naked (well, usually), which already puts them in an exclusive league. Try standing in a Walmart sometime and think of how many random people you'd like to see naked. You might be surprised how few.

.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrF

You might be surprised how few.

---

You might be surprised at how many...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TVSURFER

White chocolate? A true oxymoron if there ever was one!
Ooooo Weeeee, What's up with that, wassup wit dat? :cool:

---

lol yeah, I had some white chocolate and macadamia nut cookies with my sub, delicious! :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by seanchai

By the way, while we're on this subject, why don't you take a look at our "so-called Premium" site http://www.shemale-pornstar.com and look at the skin tone of the black models that we dared mix with the white models!

---

Show me where I mentioned anything about shemale pornstar? Show me where I said that you've never had a black girl on yum. You made a simple post into a race war.

Quit with the silly rhetoric dude. I made it perfectly clear how I could be reached. All this back and forth about nothing is getting childish.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vidman

Didn't know that was a "premium site" lol. But I just checked it out and I see a few black girls on there of all shades. Just on the front page I saw Mia Isabella, who is of the lighter complexion. I saw Natassia Dreams who is clearly of the darker persuasion. I also see Katie Coxx who is somewhat in between. Again, I'm not disagreeing with you and Remy, Seanchai. I can just see where KO was going. He tried to innocently pose it as a simple question, but he was trying to go there. I understand why he was going there and I agree with your retort. I think we get caught up on words sometimes. The title "Black-Tgirls." Anytime you put a color in anything, especially when you associate it to people, you're gonna get some pushback/defiance by someone. Maybe if it was called Shemale Sistas or something? LOL!!!!! But my point is, emphatically, that even in this day and age, race is a very very charged subject matter. As long as we've been dealing with race on this planet, it still remains the most touchy subject of all.

---

You pretty much hit the nail on the head. Go back and look at the question asked and how it was worded. How that simple question got turned into all of this is amazing. Haven't seen the boards this live since moni (the original white chocolate) used to post.

If I wanted to be ass, believe me, I am not thr type to mask my intent. I just wanted to talk about it. The king and his pawns instantly went on the defense. Never said they had a thing against black girls, never said there sites were racists, all I asked was what was the criteria. He said yum wasn't really for blacks, ok cool. If that's his thing so be it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrKnockOut

If I wanted to be ass, believe me, I am not thr type to mask my intent. I just wanted to talk about it. The king and his pawns instantly went on the defense. Never said they had a thing against black girls, never said there sites were racists, all I asked was what was the criteria. He said yum wasn't really for blacks, ok cool. If that's his thing so be it.

---

Your an ass and clown. Your intent was clear and less of the crap about king and pawns. Let me ask you one question - when I answered what the "criteria was" why did you then continue to question it?

Stop twisting the words and stop being so immature. I've posted a response to all your posts, if you want to keep this up, take it elsewhere - off this forum.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrKnockOut

You made a simple post into a race war.

Quit with the silly rhetoric dude. I made it perfectly clear how I could be reached. All this back and forth about nothing is getting childish.

---

No YOU made it into a race war which would seem to have been your intention from the beginning ... and then getting caught into calling my atitude on my "blood". You need to look at your own rhetoric, there is no back and forth - don't post replies if you don't want to keep getting answers you don't like. Fuck off elsewhere.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrKnockOut

You pretty much hit the nail on the head. Go back and look at the question asked and how it was worded. How that simple question got turned into all of this is amazing. Haven't seen the boards this live since moni (the original white chocolate) used to post.

If I wanted to be ass, believe me, I am not thr type to mask my intent. I just wanted to talk about it. The king and his pawns instantly went on the defense. Never said they had a thing against black girls, never said there sites were racists, all I asked was what was the criteria. He said yum wasn't really for blacks, ok cool. If that's his thing so be it.

---

Your post are what turned the thread into all of this. We answered the question of "what's the criteria for black tgirls to be featured on shemale yum?" on the very first page of thread. In turn you replied back taking it everywhere else it didn't need to go. You said:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrKnockOut

I think we've had this conversation before when I started to put you in contact with some of the girls I knew. The notion was that the 'redbones' got put on yum and everybody else ended up on btg. I guess that the powers that be probably didn't know that is a touchy subject within the black american community. To some it reinforces the stereotype that lighter is better. Some girls felt that they were 'better' than btg.

---

This is totally untrue and we pointed out examples to illustrate such evidence to prove your words false. You say we are on the defensive simply because we answered your question and gave examples, so it really seems that you, are on the offense. You mention that I am stating the obvious and you still don't understand? :confused: You, by your choice of words, are trying to make it appear as if skin tone is a factor, it's not. :eek: You, are the one asking if non black tgirls would be featured on a specifically black site. It's been done, and before you've brought this topic up. Also, check out hottie Unique who looks white, is mixed and on BTG cause that's how she identifies :p

As vidman stated and which you agreed:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vidman

I can just see where KO was going. He tried to innocently pose it as a simple question, but he was trying to go there.

---

We all saw where you were trying to go, and I think that's what made Seanchai blow his top perhaps. It's a wild, rude, and untrue accusation, to 'sort of' make. :cool:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Remy757Photog

Your post are what turned the thread into all of this. We answered the question of "what's the criteria for black tgirls to be featured on shemale yum?" on the very first page of thread. In turn you replied back taking it everywhere else it didn't need to go. You said:



This is totally untrue and we pointed out examples to illustrate such evidence to prove your words false. You say we are on the defensive simply because we answered your question and gave examples, so it really seems that you, are on the offense. You mention that I am stating the obvious and you still don't understand? :confused: You, by your choice of words, are trying to make it appear as if skin tone is a factor, it's not. :eek: You, are the one asking if non black tgirls would be featured on a specifically black site. It's been done, and before you've brought this topic up. Also, check out hottie Unique who looks white, is mixed and on BTG cause that's how she identifies :p

As vidman stated and which you agreed:

We all saw where you were trying to go, and I think that's what made Seanchai blow his top perhaps. It's a wild, rude, and untrue accusation, to 'sort of' make. :cool:

---

Funny how those not affiliated with you guys don't see any harm in my post or replies but you and seanchai do...I don't expect you to be the voice of reason. Funny how you cosign this cat, given the language he used. Whatever.

You highlighted that passage of mine to prove your point and proved mine instead. How in the world are YOU gonna tell me that the conversations and discussions I have with chicks are false? Really?

That's there opinion, not mine. Furthermore, that reply was in response to your reply, not his.

This cat wants to ban me sooooo bad his dick gets hard thinking about. That's some truly funny shit. Can't beat me in a debate so I'll cancel his membership from trannyland. I shouldn't be suprised given his history with posters who disagree or have contrary views than his.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by seanchai

No YOU made it into a race war which would seem to have been your intention from the beginning ... and then getting caught into calling my atitude on my "blood". You need to look at your own rhetoric, there is no back and forth - don't post replies if you don't want to keep getting answers you don't like. Fuck off elsewhere.

---

1. No, quit being bitter, what are you...19? A grown ass man carrying on like that.

2. You called me a fucking "cunt" from out of nowhere. I've bodied people for much less in my younger days. I assure you, you would never in you're privledged life say that to me in person.

3. Win the war, lose the battle. Its your site. If you wanna ban me, that's your call. but trust, I ain't an easy win my man. You can talk down to your employees, but you won't talk to me like I'm your pawn, bitch, or child.

If you want to talk like adults or handle this like men, I already told you how to reach me.

Not gonna keep circling this waggon with you. Keep my name out of your mouth. I'm done, you win.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrKnockOut

1. No, quit being bitter, what are you...19? A grown ass man carrying on like that.

---

At what point have I been bitter? What has age to do with this, refusing to be manipulated by your comments and posts and continuing to state my facts, as I did in my first response shows far more composure and maturity than your ego-driven responses have been.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrKnockOut

2. You called me a fucking "cunt" from out of nowhere. I've bodied people for much less in my younger days. I assure you, you would never in you're privledged life say that to me in person.

---

Not out of nowhere, I called you a cunt because you are a cunt. What does "bodied people" mean, I don't understand that language? I assure you, as I previously stated, if you'd called me a liar in person, like you'd insinuated here, yes Sir, I would, call you a cunt.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrKnockOut

3. Win the war, lose the battle. Its your site. If you wanna ban me, that's your call. but trust, I ain't an easy win my man. You can talk down to your employees, but you won't talk to me like I'm your pawn, bitch, or child.

---

I wasn't aware we were in a war or a battle? It is my site. By not banning you and letting you have your say, I've stated my position. I don't have any employees who have posted here. I've already talked to you like you deserve ... a cunt.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrKnockOut

If you want to talk like adults or handle this like men, I already told you how to reach me.

---

No you didn't, you told me to PM you??? I TOLD YOU WHERE TO FIND ME and if you confront me at any of those places, we'll have a drink and handle this like men, through discussion, not like children with physical threats. I bet you are dying for me to state your stereotype ... oops, I just went there.:D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrKnockOut

Not gonna keep circling this waggon with you. Keep my name out of your mouth. I'm done, you win.

---

Keep your name off this forum and I will keep my comments from my keyboard. That's all you mean to me - a troll on this forum. You are not a member so you no say here, your irrelevant to anything I have to do here. You need to check your ego ... this isn't about winning or losing, it wasn't a fight - it was a question and a fair answer, which you ignored.

As good as this post has been for SEO and the forum, I think it's talked out and as MrKnockoff stated, "he's done" - so I'm locking it.