Would you be interested in a website featuring the Plump Cakes of TS's, TV's & Fem Bottom Boys?
Would you be interested in a website featuring the Plump Cakes of TS's, TV's & Fem Bottom Boys?
Since this question was already posed by BTGP, I thought that it would be convenient to repose the question in a different manner with my own post, but just present it with an already embedded answer.
I guess that when BTGP does it, it's more socially acceptable.
The answer is:
I personally believe that in the nude, there is little difference between a TS just beginning her transition and an effeminately androgynous gay guy. This is especially true for certain gay guys like B. Scott for example, who just looks too damn pretty to be a guy. Some gay guys are just naturally soft and pretty without any cosmetics or physical embellishments at all. They really look sexy too! That's all I'm saying...
Evidently BTGP is aware of this probable perspective and posted this poll. However, apparently many people are still in denial and don't want to face their true desires or themselves.
I voted Yes.
Whats funny is i see some instances where the fem bottom dudes look better than the girl transitioning. I see a lot of instances where TS still consider you gay whether you talk to just TS or not. The area is too gray to get a definitive answer. I dont like men, I like TS, but feminine dudes tend to branch over into TS territory more so than Crossdressers and they hit the grey area in between. While I cant knock you for it, i cant talk to a man either. Just my mentality. I see TS as a woman, not as a man trying to be a woman.
Depends on what we are calling fem. Dudes with chest hair and mustaches are not fem, sorry but that is just gay to me. If your voice is deeper than mine and you are more swole than I am (and I am pretty swole), that aint fem. Just cause u put on pink undies and get fucked in the ass don't make u fem in my book. Fem to me is identifying as a male gender wise but sexually identifying with the female side. That means female mannerisms and characteristics without trying to be a ts.
Not interested, but I don't watch much porn at all really. If the company wanted to make a site like that I'd film it though.
Exactly! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by MrKnockOut
I voted hell no why would I want to look at a gay guys ass?!!!?:confused:
yes i would
I like WOMEN: TG Women & GG Women. Period. Now if a TS website has other material available (TV's & FB's) so be it. As long as I can specify what I want to see is what matters. BGC has a format which somewhat attempts to do that...BUT too much negative chatter/arguing takes place between the different groups.
no fucking thank you
Combining the 'No' and the 'Hell Nah' votes it looks like most aren't interested.
Problem I see with that kind of site, that mixes ts and gay content is that the demographic for those two genre of porn are not usually the same. Most viewers of TS porn identify as being Straight, and most viewers of Gay porn are not going to pay to watch TS content.
I thought the Bang Bros were going to turn the TS genre on it's head, but seems like they are still struggling to realize the difference between Gay and TS porn, especially regarding their marketing approach. So much for an awesome production studio for TS content on the east coast...
29 no's to 27 yes's isn't much of a lead, i'd say it closer to 50/50 split. That's if include the "Yes & Maybe" catagories