Printable View
I have been a member for many years and a T-girl lover for decades. This site is really great but could improve. Here are my suggestions for improving the site. More close ups! Some different camera angles like point of view (POV) photos. More cum shots. Shots of models playing with cum. How about a three page minimum per shoot. More cock close ups. What do you think about my suggestions?! What are your suggestions for an improved site?
I was so gonna suggest a POV. Good looking outQuote:
Originally Posted by surferja
I could do without more cock close-ups; I like seeing the whole body with a strong dose of ass.:D I agree with the cumshots but honestly, sometimes girls can't cum and 90% of the girls (or more) cannot cum more than once with any volume due to all the hormones. So, although it may be nice, it also may not be possible. I do like the POV stuff. When the photographer gets in on the action and does it POV style its hot. Tom in SF and DirtySouth were good at that.Quote:
Originally Posted by surferja
more cumshots.
i'm sick of watching scenes ending without a cumshot.
Definitely more cock close-up photos and video. Also, it's good when the photographers are able to bring out the girl's personality. Nothings worse on this site than a boring shoot with goofy questions from a photog and girls who won't talk or hardly talk at all.
Also, there are too many girls who've obviously have just started transitioning and are nothing more than tvs. I'd rather see updates on the best of the best than some chick who just started transitioning a month ago and is confused as hell about her sexuality and just might go back to being a li'l boy in another month. :(
There are probably perhaps about 100 girls on this site that really bring in the bacon and keep us cummin' back for more. Now that Grooby and this site are well established, PLEASE update the most popular girls on the regular and let the tv and ittybittytittycommitee go elsewhere. :cool:
Attachment 7096
Attachment 7097
Attachment 7098lol WELL hmmm i guess im part of that itty bitty titty commitee. No offense but I know a few girls on the site who have hugemongous boob jobs and they cant even let out a skeet of cum lol I always try to have good perfromances and also a try to be the fan pleaser and shoot huge loads.. It may not had been reffered to me but its not always about the boob size babe, most men like cute perky titties .. Remeber that this site does not revolve around one type of transexual! It may get boring after a while..Steven im sure created this black t girl site so that it would satisfy every man's fantasy and by that Im saying you would have options.. Here you have variety and its always nice to see a ts develope with updates because its like you were there from the begining being a part of the history of someone maybe soon to be Ts pornstar of the year,,never know these days. I remeber when I started and Im still growing in quite nicely since i first started and barley had a titty at all lol but i had a huge fan base from my 1st performance and I didnt rush my process and I stuck to it...NOt here to talk your head just saying sometimes you should give the newbies a shot you never want to run away good talent take that from a woman who knows from experinece! Just look at my old black t girl pics "sasha" and look at my updates on my profile I dont have huge breast but I am apealing to the eye with a great personality its what kept me afloat in this industry..Quote:
Originally Posted by Cam Brazille
IT takes time boo lol It takes Time...;)
MUch LOVe
XOXOX
Sasha Strokes http://http://www.blackshemale.org/s...lack-shemales/
For all of the regular members who can recall when I suggested, and it was a suggestion, about a POV from the models. Well, it turned out that a photog, who by the way isn't shooting for the site anymore, got egoistic and said it wasn't his style! Now mind you, I only suggested it because every set was girls stripping, laying back and jerking off for the reminder of the shoot. I felt at the time a little pre-production wouldn't hurt, as a matter of fact, it would only cost a little of the photog and model's time, but that settled like smoke in the wind. I just thought it would be something different, to hear the girls talk about what they liked and to even hear their voices instead of 'thank you' to miniscule compliments! At the time I didn't mean to flatten someone's ego, so I backed off from suggesting anything because some of the photogs took it personal and didn't want to be told how to do their business.Quote:
Originally Posted by Omega
To be frank however, there are photogs who do it now, but it seems some members want more POV. One photog in particular, always engages his models and we are entertained with massive hardons and good cum shots; some on glass tables. Another photog has the girls pop off in a, ugh, glass, but it is something different than jacking off for 10 to 15 minutes! Since then we have girls bathing in baby oil and the singularly entertaining, booty popping, however, it is entertaining and not so mundane.
Before we had regular hardcore, just about all of the photogs, except one, participated in the shoots by either touching the models or getting a blow job which seem to break the monotony of just having the girls jerk their meat!
It's good to see, now, that the hardcores have story lines, simple plots, creampies, facials, pissing (for those who like that sort of thing) and even choking:p! :D
:cool:
Every model has a cumshot. She shoots two scenes, the second scene has the cumshot. It's getting tiring answering this same question.Quote:
Originally Posted by xtacy
The best thing about feedback and opinions, is that everyone has them and they do help us decide what to do for the site. The worst thing is when someone thinks that their opinion is what everyone else wants.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cam Brazille
We'll continue to shoot the widest range of tgirl models. Many of the bigger boobed models started out as "ittybittytitty" models and as many people prefer the models with less surgery, as do ones with more. It's about having a wide range but the "ittybittytitty" are going nowhere.
You must not have been around when this was an extensive topic of discussion. Every girl coudn't give the cum shot that most members craved. Some were just too nervous or they were taking treatments. And to be honest, it's not going to change very much in the future because of the meds some girls are taking. Case in point one of the cuties I've profiled on this site told me that she has refrained from cumming so much because it impeded her female development! She said she would rather give up cumming for the sake of looking good! The last time we talked she said she hadn't cum in months. Although, when said she did, it came out in a clear type of liquid and wasn't that much; not heavy and thick as we are used to seeing! I have taken her at her word.Quote:
Originally Posted by xtacy
:cool:
I like small boobs on both women and transgirls. Sooo frankly the belief that a large bust size makes a trans more feminine is flat out bullshit. A fat man with bigger titties does not become more of a woman, so why would anyone else?
Sasha..Sasha that itty bitty titty shiggity don't mean a thing to da real men on this forum and speaking of tittys..anything over a mouthful is going to waste anyway.you are a beautiful and fine sista.Photo#1..Dayum.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasha
Well I'm going to have to step on a few toes ,but as a card carrying member of the Dcup and above society anything over a mouthful is definitely is not a waste maybe in your opinion:rolleyes:,But we all have to start somewhere, I say respect the itty bittys and the super jugs in the end lol it's the girl's decision not yours and it's all about variety ;)
Agreed. Honestly I like pretty much all boobs... titties are great.Quote:
Originally Posted by carmencream
You know, several girls we probably both know have told me this. What is with this myth in the TG community that if you cum you void hormone treatments? I gotta admit, I never really cared about them cumming as much until an online chat with another member who suggested I try it and I did. It's nice watching them get all orgasmic, so I want them to cum.Quote:
Originally Posted by TVSURFER
Well that is my OPINION and no disrespect to you but you will not be stepping on my toes..i ain't with that shiggity.Quote:
Originally Posted by carmencream
Lol I guess:rolleyes:
+1. :D I agree with that one.Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmicTraveler
As far as what might improve this site, I think I voted for different camera angles. To be honest, though, I don't think the poll offered enough choices.
I really like it when the site finds popular hot models like Sheeba and features them regularly. I agree with the guy who said there are about 100 models who keep us coming back. I'm not sure if the figure is really 100, but it makes sense to me to pick out the most popular 100 and feature regular updates of each of them whenever possible.
Also, it would really enhance the site if we could see each others' favorites.
Oh, yeah, and I almost forgot: more lactation. I'd definitely like to see more lactation. I realize, though, that it's not that simple. :)
I never get tired of hearing someone speak for the "real men" on the forum! :rolleyes: lol.. Any boob more than a mouthfull just means more foreplay! Take it all gents. :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboMan
bye the bye, Im more concerned with pec size :eek: :D
Hey carmencream..believe me my comment was not a put down in any shape form or fashion and just like nycguy stated about more foreplay.. I'll buy that..have a great weekend sweetie.Quote:
Originally Posted by carmencream
You are right, it is an Urban Myth. Actually, light exercising (aerobics, calisthenics) is good as it helps bloodflow to prevent bloodclots which is a real side effect from a proper hormone regiment. There are a variety of factors that can impede one's hormonal development, and one in particular which many don't realize is Caffeine which promotes testosterone development greatly. :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by bigdicki
That is why my balls are as big as a bulls?Quote:
Originally Posted by Remy757Photog
And smoking constantly doesn't help either but we both know they ignore that. I love my girls but some of the rumors and silliness are annoying.Quote:
Originally Posted by Remy757Photog
I think you are confused; they just look big because your penis is the size of a spider monkey's. :D Just breaking your... balls. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by seanchai
Says he who looks at spider monkeys cocks?Quote:
Originally Posted by bigdicki
Touche Seanchai... touche.
Sasha, Sasha, Sasha.....I was affraid that when I typed the words "....let the tv and ittybittytitty committee go elsewhere" that some might get offended and that those few words at the end of my message might overshadow the rest. Believe me Sasha, you are one of the girls that I was refering to as one of the 100 or so who bring in the bacon. In fact, if I made a 'top 10' list from this site you'd be on it because I LOVE the beautiful personality you project here, as well as your gorgeous body. And if I was to make a personal 'top 100 list', perhaps half of the girls would be A cups. And I definitely agree that it is nice to see girls' bodies develop over the years.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasha
What I was refering to were transvestites who have little or no intention of developing their bodies much further and becoming real transsexuals, where more updates of beautiful girls such as yourself would be ideal. Now, hopefully the words "real transsexuals" will not offend some. If so, I apologize in advance. YIKES! :eek:
YIKES!, again, my 'ittybittytitty committee' comment was NOT meant to be offensive.Quote:
Originally Posted by seanchai
I'm with you on this one. Not sure if these TVs are meant to cater to the TV loving crowd (whatever that is), or used as filler (it must be easier to find men willing to put on a dress than to find genuine TSes) but, whatever.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cam Brazille
I've seen Cam Brazille's comments on other sites and they usually reveal taste and a discerning eye. As a fellow TS lover, I agree that quality trumps quantity every time. I'd rather see fewer models if that means each one is more attractive.
Ho-fucking-hum - this old chestnut again.Quote:
Originally Posted by TBisca/Leopard
We don't put filler on this site, we handpick every model and if some look better than others, or some are more beginners than others, than that's because that's what we do. We don't feature TV's. We feature tgirls and the majority of them are transgenders in some stages of the process of being a transsexual. Yes some girls are more at the beginning of their transition than others but it's through sites like this and Shemale Yum that we've found many of the most exciting TG models, many of whom have developed with the site into the more polished model.
By taking a wide range of models it not only enables us to work with some of the best new models but also encourages many younger and beginner tgirls to continue on the path and to continue to model. Sure, not all models we choose end up being hits. Many don't look or perform as well as we thought they had - but almost every model we work with, at the time of shooting or submitting their application, deserved a go.
"Attractive" is subjective. Don't be ignorant by thinking everyone has the same tastes as you or because some doesn't have tits then she must by a TV. If you want quality over quantity, then you are still getting it here as I don't see any other sites uploading this amount of quality black tgirls over a month.
Who are you to suggest that they have no intention of developing their bodies further? Do you know each and every one of these girls personally? Many of the model we feature may be testing the waters and showing themselves on a site for the first time. Many are young and just started their transition.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cam Brazille
It's subjective, Cam.
Some of the models aren't your type, that's fair enough but don't pigeon hole or suggest a model is something other than she is, just because she isn't your type.
Geez! O.k., o.k., please stop beating me over my head because I responded to sureferja's original question about suggestions for improving this site. I wasn't aware that my suggestions had to be politically correct and in agreement with admin's. One little comment, pun intended, about ittybittytitties has led to a well-taken lecture. I'm sorry I ever typed it. Besides, looking in my 'Personal Portfolio' I see SEVERAL girls with small and ittybittytitties and I LIKE 'em! [The girls, that is.]Quote:
Originally Posted by Cam Brazille
I'm not going to name any names in order to avoid another possible round of replies and another possible lecture. But suffice it to say that many, I'm sure, are among the most popular on this site, including many Models of the Month, and are among those who are "bringing in the bacon". And in fact, I do know some personally or have met some and although tits don't make the t-girl, the before and after affect is usually an enhancement.
So to ALL the small-breasted and ittybittytitty girls, and to those in the early stages of transition, PLEASE keep modeling here and elsewhere and showin' us ALL your goodies! :D:D:D
Humbled and more mellowed, thanks to all,
Cam Brazille
Well, you own the site, obviously, and can do and say whatever you please. More power to you. I agree that "'attractive' is subjective;" that's why when you open the pages of Vogue or Playboy or the Victoria's Secret catalog, you see morbidly obese girls and skinny girls and knock-kneed men in frocks and . . . oh, wait . . . .Quote:
Originally Posted by seanchai
What's the opinion of one or two or three paying customers? Those who bother to voice their opinions probably don't represent lots of other customers and potential customers who don't give their opinion. If they don't like it they can start their own damn site, right? No need for an "Ideas for improvement" thread.
It's actually kind of cool in a way that you respond to suggestions you don't agree with by browbeating the customers who make them. Kind of like the sushi nazi but with porn. Definitely a unique approach to business.
Anyway, I see your point about giving girls a chance to develop. That does make sense.
We are not Playboy or Victoria Secret catalogues - that's the point!Quote:
Originally Posted by TBisca/Leopard
There isn't enough paying customers to support a number of niche sites for Black transgenders. It's fairly direct niche, already and a small slice of the transgender niche in total. So by bringing them all in one place, we're able to run a site that caters to multiple tastes and desires. Sure not every girl in every update is going to be your type - but when I open Playboy, it's the same.
Although I do welcome feedback and we've made a lot of changes on the site over the last few years or longer, because of customers requests, we're not going to change the ethos of what the site was built on and showcases over 300 model sets a year for the past 12 yrs, which is the diversity of content. Every paying customer is listened to and responded to but it's the masses who keep paying, who comment or rate models and who keep this site going who are the most important. It's funny, that should I disagree with your comment, you call me a Nazi ... yet you are the one that is discriminating against models on their body size or shape.
Looking at the Top 20 list I just put up - under your "guidelines" some of those models would never have been photographed in the first place and therefore, never have came back for reshoots and their current popularity.
That's a stupid comparison, Vogue and Victoria Secret don't show nudity or cater to the Trans community, and Playboy features almost identical girls issue after issue. Despite all that, look how few publications they do a year. So you are saying you'd rather us only update once a month and only feature the best of the best, in a more High Fashion upscale approach instead of in raunchy, kinky, and naughty fun? Actually, that's an idea I've had for a while, but haven't figured out a way for it to make money. So honestly how many of you would pay to see the girls clothed only when you can see them naked on other sites?Quote:
Originally Posted by TBisca/Leopard
If you are going to compare us to another company at least make it a company that exclusively features Black Tgirls. Oh wait... there aren't many, and those that do exist primarily show Brasilians as the bulk of their content with a few sporadic shoots of American Black Tgirls here and there, and don't have nearly the archives we do, with the exception of Black Tranny Whackers which are doing their thing. I, for one, don't think those other sites will even last long, maybe another year or two, and you may get 10 American Black girls if your lucky in that time.
PLAYBOY??? PLAYBOY!!! PLAYBOY??? Did someone mention PLAYBOY??? Talk about a real snooze that could use some beautiful chicks with dicks to save itself! With the financial ups and downs of that company, it sure would be nice if Hef would get real and embrace the beauty of t-girl cock, too! :D:D:DQuote:
Originally Posted by Remy757Photog
Well, I guess he's liberal, but not THAT liberal! But I wouldn't be surprised if ol' Hef's taken a peep now 'n then.
But, of course, it is his company and his magazine for the most part, and his rollercoaster revenue stream as well all because he wants to continue with a 'girl next door' facade. Yeah right......how many of your neighbors are well into their senior years and living with three 'playmates'?
One of the things that I love most about this site is that, because of its large archive, every time I log-on I see photos and more often than not videos of girls that I've overlooked through the years, and it's like discovering them for the very first time.
Diversity is a great thing. PLEASE Grooby, keep 'em cumming!!!
:) To be fair, Playboy has, on very rare occasions, featured transexuals (once or twice I think). And Hef doesn't actually run Playboy anymore, he just sits back and reaps the benefits of his daughters continued work for the company if I recall correctly. On the bright side, I'm all for the girls running the company and bringing a whole new level of respect to the business that can't be matched by the other sex. No offense guys :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by Cam Brazille
I don't think Playboy has featured transsexuals? Hustler has.Quote:
Originally Posted by Remy757Photog
Playboy is in BIG financial trouble, they didn't adapt to new technology fast or well enough.
Opps, I stand corrected, I knew it was one of those biggies, way to go Flynt :p
Yeah a lot of companies got hit hard by not jumping on the Internet bandwagon quick enough. I have my 3D specs ready for the next big tech sweep! :) :rolleyes:
PLAYBOY once featured a post-op actress by the name of Tula in the 90's, but none with all the goodies. You'll find Tula at Transcelebs.com.