Quote Originally Posted by Ms Remy M View Post
I don't think anyone is wrongly assuming anything. Look at the rating system that is in place. Any girl that doesn't get hard and/or bust a huge load of cum gets the lowest votes on the site 98% of the time. One or two people on this forum speaking out against it aren't going to change much. People actively neglect to use the rating/comment system in place for each model, each set of pics and vids for each model.

Don't get me wrong I totally agree with you personally. The fact remains that anyone can log onto the site right now and see girls with no hormones, rock hard cock, big hanging balls, spewing cum across the room rating higher than some soft skin, no muscle tone, no hard cock, no cum scene girl. In case anyone is confused, when on hormones your cum is clear not white, creamy and large, the ball sack shrinks, there are no veins popping out on the arms, there is a loss of muscle tone lol. So many guys that girls "in sex trade" encounter crave those qualities so much, that girls will rush to get pumped or if smart implants just so they can stop hormones and deliver the cum and hard cocks that guys overwhelmingly demand. It's a vicious cycle of girls giving what the men demand. Even with guys that are TOPS that want to fuck a girl, they eventually still want to see her get hard and/or cum regardless if it's possible for her to do so or not. The reasoning I hear most from guys, is that this is how they know the girl is into it. Uh no, you know she is into in the same ways a female is into, she is squirming and making those sound effects, and if you are fucking her just right, she may leak prostate fluid from her cock, which again, is still clear.

I've met so many beautiful trans women that refuse to shoot porn because either they don't want to be featured with girls who don't take their transition seriously and/or will have to feature their own cock prominently. At the end of the day many trans women didn't become women to have their cock obsessed over, they became women to be women.
I know that from a commercial angle it may appear sensible to cater to the most vociferous cock-lurping queens and fiends lol.... After all, like you say, they are the guys that wail and nag the most when they dont get what they want (which is wall-to-wall COCK)

But, they are no more than a (very) loud minority.... I still don't get why TS sites don't just fuck them off and supply what they want to supply: it's not as if the cock queens are gonna cease buying TS Porn lol?... Look at guys like me - I've been effectively starved of TS ass for years, and in numerous posts I've begged and demanded MORE TS ass lol... But all the while, despite feeling short changed (in terms of TS ass) I've consistently spent funds on TS Porn because I am bewitched (and quite touched, actually) by their connection and loyalty to femininity... By the same token, if TS sites take the plunge and radically change their one-dimensional representation of TS Women and show them across all 360 degrees of their Womanly powers (rather than just 6 or 7 inches of it) then they will not lose the cock queens lol... TS Porn wont lose any of their consumers because guys obsess about TS Women... The difference is: some guys obsess about TS Women, period.... while other guys only obsess about TS cock....

I take your point that TS sites don't want to risk alienating their "core" audience... but you're not gonna lose any of their custom lol??? ...

On the other hand, by showing TS Women as ultra-femme babes who want to be made love to (or fucked hard and fast) by a man, and consequently showing much MUCH more ass, especially stretched open and wide and gaping and lubed etc.... TS sites may just open the party up to a whole new world of open-minded men.

blue eyed devil