Black Shemale Idol # 3

[werwt22]

We're constantly adjusting and tweaking based on customer feedback, of course - and overwhelmingly, people like what we do, who we show and how we show them. We've created sites for those who like it a little the content a little more polished. Technical advances also contribute to what looks like more "glamour". We don't dictate how we show the girls, we encourage girls to show themselves how they like to portray themselves.

I like what both you guys are saying. But theres still always room for innovation

[SHAUN]

Different strokes for different folks. I love working with Wendy Summers, and Brittany St Jordan, because they effortlessly come up with unique and awesome ideas and twist to doing porn. They are breaking the mold whilst still providing the essential ingredients to hot porn. While it may not be to any one individuals taste, they serve their niche well which would be otherwise left wanting.

I truly have to say working with Sasha Strokes, Wendy Summers, Harley Quinn aka Bailey Jay, Brittany St Jordan, and Amber Skye has been some of the shoots that I really have the most fun filming. I never would have known about cosplay used for porn if not for Bailey Jay and the fun that comes with acting out popular characters with a sexual twist.

I would have never thought to mix Atari with porn, but Wendy Summers did and I loved it! To recreate the popular (to comic geeks) Iron Man scene where he fights with alcoholism (changed to Spunk Lube ) only could come from the delightful mind of Wendy Summers. To use the popular Words With Friends (Scrabble) game in a porn scene, again some fucking great ideas courtesy of Wendy. We even found a way to film making coffee look so fucking hot and I thank Wendy Summers for each opportunity to work with such a beautifully different type of porn star.

To mix gun and knife play into a shoot was something I always wanted to do, but each of these models came to me with their own unique twist to making it happen, Bailey Jay, Brittany St Jordan, Wendy Summers and Amber Skye, and I enjoyed each production with those models because they are thinking outside the box instead of sticking to the tried and true formula. Amber and I spend a great deal of time on the motorcycle, so it was only natural to incorporate a bit of that reality into a recent shoot, because while we are selling a fantasy it's also fun to give a peek into the inner lives we live.

So again, while it may not float your boat specifically, trust that the interwebs is a big place and many men are enjoying it just as much as you enjoy your lingerie sets and none are of less value.

All perfectly valid, Remy, no doubt.... I only ask: is this what a guy wants to WANK over?

Although I sympathise that creative models - and the cameras that capture them - might feel a need to throw in the odd leftfield set here and there because they might feel they are doing too much of the same old same old, my observation is that in the sites of Hazel, Amy and Wendy such sets have become the norm, thereby devaluing them of any maverick "interesting" status they may have otherwise achieved....

Some things don't need to be twisted; people/guys are having sex and wanking in pretty much the same way today as they did a zillion years ago - what's to twist?

For the record I imply NO criticism of Wendy, Amy and Hazel, all of whom are very sexy models: Wendy has a unique and totally gorgeous housewife thing going on, with a lovely phat ass, likewise Amy, and Hazel is simply STUNNING... My criticism is aimed at the site policy that seems to dictate providing "interesting" sets is more important than providing good old honest WANK MATERIAL (which invariably revolves around the fantasies of the male Customer, i.e. FEMME SEDUCTION, not the fantasies/indulgences of the Models or Producers)

And I certainly wont entertain any deluded nonsense from Sean or Amber or anyone about GLAMOUR sets of Models looking utterly RAVISHING being somehow inauthentic and blocking the Model from truly representing herself????? WTF lmao, that has to be some of the most self-justifying deluded shit I ever heard....

Sean, you ever carried out a survey on such matters of what Customers want to wank over?... Care to share it with us?... You talk of "feedback"? Well HERE it is! THIS is feedback about site policy.... So why knock it?

10 years ago a guy like me was lucky to get ANY personality from the Model (much less ass-play) at all... AT ALL!! But I stick with it, I subscribe, I buy the VHS, I buy the DVDs, because I sense an integrity with Grooby that other sites dont have.... (and errrr, because every now and then good wank material is provided lol... )

5 years ago there was a little more ass-play offered to guys like me, but still you'd be LUCKY to get more than 30 seconds in a 12 minute vid....

2 years ago that 30 seconds of ass play increased to about 2 minutes... HALLE -FUCKING-LULAH!...

Now, at present, the split seems to have plateaud at roughly 70/30 in terms of cock play/ass play: still not enough for me, but a million times better than it had been for many years.... And we're getting more GLAMOUR and FEMME FATALE sets, all very welcome to Customers like me....

Such is the value of FEEDBACK...

What really cracks me up is that such comments as mine are confronted with some dead logic about "yeh, but Shaun, not everyone thinks like you, feels like you, wanks like you etc"... When did I state they did? Errrr hello, Sean, all I'm asking for (all I've ever asked for) is more balance, not World Domination or management of Grooby website policy lol.... Can anyone here convince me that COCK-PLAY doesn't D O M I N A T E TS Porn, not just at the expense of ASS-PLAY, but even at the expense of the Model's unique persona and character... THAT'S the point I'm making, right there...

For the most part, the times I feel that the Model is having a great time and TRULY engaging with her audience is when she is performing a drop dead gorgeous power- femme type set..... And, correspondingly, the times when a Model appears disengaged with the camera (like she's got her mind on what she's gonna have for dinner that night, rather than performing) are the sets where GLAMOUR is absent, and a painting-by-numbers yawnathon set proceeds where the model whips her knickers off as quickly as you can say "BORING!", and proceeds to stroke her cock while staring vacantly in the distance.... "Now that's what I call FORMULAIC, part 117"

Sadly, GLAMOUR sets are NOT the stereotypical norm, as Amber suggests (I WISH THEY WERE!!!).... What has become the norm, however, are "interesting" sets.... All very "interesting" for the people directly involved, perhaps...... But how many Customers' loins are caused to twitch by "interesting" stuff, and then wank over such material?

Meanwhile, simple-minded male chauvanist PAYING Customers like me will be wanking over "stereotypical pretty porn shit" like BLACK SHEMALE IDOL for another zillion years, no doubt about it

blue eyed devil

[tsamberskyi]

Who cares this much about porn lmao.its a gorgeous day outside, stop playing with your cock and writing dissertations about porn.go out and enjoy life hun.

[SHAUN]

Remy,

I should add, for the sake of balance and clarity, that your sets are normally glamorous, erotic AND interesting

And, of course, there is nothing boring about cock-play, or "interesting" themed sets.... so long as they don't get in the way of a more honest and fully rounded erotica.

blue eyed devil

(Original definition of GLAMOUR: a spell, or enchantment, placed on a human by a SUPERNATURAL BEING, in order that they may do your bidding.... As in, to place a "glamour" on someone)

[SHAUN]

Who cares this much about porn lmao.its a gorgeous day outside, stop playing with your cock and writing dissertations about porn.go out and enjoy life hun.

Errrr, I do (blushes)

[GroobySteven]

Sean, you ever carried out a survey on such matters of what Customers want to wank over?... Care to share it with us?... You talk of "feedback"? Well HERE it is! THIS is feedback about site policy.... So why knock it?

Everyday and no.

What really cracks me up is that such comments as mine are confronted with some dead logic about "yeh, but Shaun, not everyone thinks like you, feels like you, wanks like you etc"... When did I state they did? Errrr hello, Sean, all I'm asking for (all I've ever asked for) is more balance, not World Domination or management of Grooby website policy lol.... Can anyone here convince me that COCK-PLAY doesn't D O M I N A T E TS Porn, not just at the expense of ASS-PLAY, but even at the expense of the Model's unique persona and character... THAT'S the point I'm making, right there...

If you don't mean that, then that's how your postings (which border on rants) come across, Shaun. They come across as if you are preaching what is right and what is wrong, with porn. All feedback is valid, we try to reach out and please (appease) as many people as we can on our sites but what we'll rarely do is make a model into something she's not (or can't pull off) or make the girls homogeneous. etc. Some models simply won't be for every customer, we just hope that some will.

[Ms Remy M]

For the record I imply NO criticism of Wendy, Amy and Hazel, all of whom are very sexy models: Wendy has a unique and totally gorgeous housewife thing going on, with a lovely phat ass, likewise Amy, and Hazel is simply STUNNING... My criticism is aimed at the site policy that seems to dictate providing "interesting" sets is more important than providing good old honest WANK MATERIAL (which invariably revolves around the fantasies of the male Customer, i.e. FEMME SEDUCTION, not the fantasies/indulgences of the Models or Producers)

And I certainly wont entertain any deluded nonsense from Sean or Amber or anyone about GLAMOUR sets of Models looking utterly RAVISHING being somehow inauthentic and blocking the Model from truly representing herself????? WTF lmao, that has to be some of the most self-justifying deluded shit I ever heard....

As was stated by Seanchai, I personally request models wear attire they would be comfortable filming in and expresses their own sense of style. I make the suggestion that one outfit be casual attire, and one outfit be intimate attire. However; the model is free to choose both casual attire or both lingerie. When they arrive I have them lay out their outfits they would feel most confident wearing and then I help them choose what might be best considering what we are filming.

If a model is a bottom, I wont sit there forcing her to try and get hard for pics and then again for video. It isn't genuine and generally comes off looking lame, so instead I ask for dildo and/or other forms of ass play. If she is versatile or a Top then I try to get a fair mixture of both out of her, but ultimately its what the model is comfortable with.

A lot of girls are hesitant about doing porn because they are on hormones and have this misconception that the only way they can perform (in this industry) is if they stop hormones and are able to get hard and shoot cum across the room. Hooray for the girls that are able to do that, but I feel it's counter-productive for a transsexuals existence to stop hormones for any reasons aside from medical, so I certainly don't suggest such to them.

[Ms Remy M]

For the record I imply NO criticism of Wendy, Amy and Hazel, all of whom are very sexy models: Wendy has a unique and totally gorgeous housewife thing going on, with a lovely phat ass, likewise Amy, and Hazel is simply STUNNING... My criticism is aimed at the site policy that seems to dictate providing "interesting" sets is more important than providing good old honest WANK MATERIAL (which invariably revolves around the fantasies of the male Customer, i.e. FEMME SEDUCTION, not the fantasies/indulgences of the Models or Producers)

You seem to still imply that there is a difference between interesting sets and wank material. Well, again this is wank material for male customers who appreciate something a little different in their porn viewing experience. By the way, Brittany St Jordan, Wendy Summers, Amy Daly, and Hazel Tucker are all models and producers, in that they are making the material they want. When Wendy or Brittany hire me for a shoot for their solo sites, I consider myself simply the camera person, not the producer. Sometimes they may want me to come up with my own idea for a shoot and then I consider myself the producer. Generally though, I'm simply helping to bring the vision they want together.

[SHAUN]

It's not meant as a rant Sean lol, it's just my passion brimming over... In this case, initiated by the uber-glam of a DVD whose style and content I wish we would see much more of...

Now, if Hazel, Wendy and Amy BALANCED their site content with more dropdead femme-fatale sets like that, and cooled off on the geeky/kooky/girl-next-door just lounging around at home type sets....... then a lot more people would be happy, a lot more of the time.

When I come to rule the world, of course I will dictate that ALL sets must be just as I desire them to be, with uber-babes in lingerie, stroking their stockinged legs, licking their blood red lips, stretching and gaping their asses and playing with their cocks in EQUAL measure....

But until then, I only ask for more balance.... Meaning: lets have more killer Femme sets (or "stereotypical pretty porn bullshit" sets, as some might affect to call them lol)

Balance, that's all.... (I didn't even think I was being contraversial, which I suppose shows we still have some way to go lol)

blue eyed devil

[Ms Remy M]

Now, if Hazel, Wendy and Amy BALANCED their site content with more dropdead femme-fatale sets like that, and cooled off on the geeky/kooky/girl-next-door just lounging around at home type sets....... then a lot more people would be happy, a lot more of the time.

How do you know that a lot of people are not happy all the time with their content? Are you aware of their sites member counts? Do you have purview to their customer feedback on each of those sites? It all just seems like speculation really. If their sites are not to your taste there are many other solo sites, Bailey Jay, Domino, that do cater more to what you are looking for.